[dtn-interest] Re: DTNRG arch document ready to send to RFC editor

[Aaron Falk <[e-mail]>]

Stephen-

Should I assume that you would like the doc to be Informational (as  
opposed to Experimental) and that the IESG use this 'blurb' (see  
draft-irtf-rfcs for the alternative):

      "This RFC is a product of the Internet Research Task Force and
       is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard.  The
       IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research and
       development activities.  These results might not be suitable
       for deployment."
?

--aaron

On Jan 11, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> In accordance with current IRTF processes, the DTNRG arch
> document [1], is now finished IRSG review and ready for you
> to send to the RFC editor.
>
> The tracker ticket [2] for this has links to the various stages of
> the review, including the last entry which links to the "go ahead"
> messages [3,4] from the folks whose comments were addressed in the
> last stage of the review. The original IRSG reviews are [5,6]
> and the RG "please ok" thread is [7].
>
> I'll be shepherd for this document which is intended to become
> an informational RFC.
>
> Regards,
> Stephen.
>
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-08.txt
> [2] http://www1.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/6
> [3] http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/2006-December/ 
> 002456.html
> [4] http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/2007-January/ 
> 002486.html
> [5] http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/2006-May/ 
> 002173.html
> [6] http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/2006-May/ 
> 002173.html
> [7] http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-interest/2006-February/ 
> 002091.html
>