Re: [dtn-interest] Bad Clock Vs. Clock rating (0)

<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Mon, 16 May 2016 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BFD12D56D for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2016 18:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=surreyac.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xxgrdyFY01zR for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2016 18:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta14.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta14.messagelabs.com [193.109.254.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1287412D127 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2016 18:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [193.109.255.147] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id A6/80-02833-67129375; Mon, 16 May 2016 01:25:10 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA1WSa0hTYRjHe885u2geO05rj0sxT4ShTVIilt2 ksoyI9ENIC6yzOrkT27SdWUZfzOzCKCYrE0ehkVnNDK2MvFTmpVoWZknRXVxCXrpYUpA229mZ Zu+n//v8nv9zgUeOKxqlKjmbZ2HNJsZASwOJQ+6Hc9W50UsyFo44aY2r7gmu+TZehzTdp57Ik vHUesc7WerJ2lZpGqaVcCZddt52iX6owoHlNKTltY6/xvJR5zorCpQrqFoE3wZGkBUFeD8dCF 582SQAgjqOw/HDvzAxqwtBy89yQvy0ILhTcoYQLFJqNlT3Vfh0GLUB3tZf9JUKpZKg8dwHf3w pXB+s8utEKPxqwwVNUPPA5iyWCJqktGDvbyfEMdJgrOOoTNABVDqU1XT5chAVCaNP3/i8OKWE awU2Xy+gKKho6sRFPRP63R6JMCiirAg8Rx77AQ2Fd+1+w0b4/a7Stw1QHhzcrvN+kAIua7dfc 9D+uRUTdSwca3NgoqEaQd+JEqkIImC4tFkmgl4J1L22+fdXwcGmy4SoI+DT29sScW4TPL/yCh N3DgFX6UeiCMU4pqzkmJLmmJImxhdAeeN3qajjoPLcID6hHze7sanxciRzohieNe9lzerF8To zl6W3GBnOoE5IWBRvZHmeyWINjI6P35FtvIa8RzXN+26hP0WrW1C4HKNnkgdGNRmKYF32zv16 htdvM+caWL4FRcjlNJBdUUsyFCFmNovN28UZvJc5gUEeRIeRy+d4McnnMEaeyxLRIxStUpLzB UAJQJ9rmrRN3PQzFKkKJZF3EEVQDms2cpb/+QBSyhEdSiqFKkGcyTJZfcDbGPM2LlqsERpbmH 9IlY/0pfa96Ykvl53e/XIskAhf059/b/P9O52ZW/f9KtVz/dqq7v2fBz2WPWM10UP4ipVRV28 O9SiNwasexI0k9bDuG673vwe0lSlG7Sx402BRSc52XCJbL4w9dBY+L/uxJZOcMTo86ng0fX1c Fb8xM7kgZcWweiFnVxX3trG3bzQUrKUJXs8kxOJmnvkLRHdxSM4DAAA=
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-72.messagelabs.com!1463361909!21112084!1
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.35]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 8.34; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 29125 invoked from network); 16 May 2016 01:25:09 -0000
Received: from exht021p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT021P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.35) by server-15.tower-72.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 May 2016 01:25:09 -0000
Received: from EXHY022V.surrey.ac.uk (131.227.201.104) by EXHT021P.surrey.ac.uk (131.227.200.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.348.2; Mon, 16 May 2016 02:25:08 +0100
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (131.227.201.241) by EXHY022v.surrey.ac.uk (131.227.201.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 16 May 2016 02:25:08 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=surreyac.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-surrey-ac-uk; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=t1EgKxh3Au6EGYsxtP7GzYhEkDOHmMIftdTzr5a31o8=; b=hsN/O/Ip/ue2VtMiMBTiaatnz3H71vuA5sAqLX2DGLy3JoCRce5hFK/UERHbxAh7SnQIRDa22IobmzaXvCAnAkih288uIY2PfXXyknkxKBu8+Jld4oOunS2y5n8IogseLEoQpA6Th13wN1/kxsdZPMcCeo/xJ6Dqqu8R8jhJuNw=
Received: from DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.238.15) by DB4PR06MB459.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.238.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.497.3; Mon, 16 May 2016 01:25:07 +0000
Received: from DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.238.15]) by DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.238.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0497.017; Mon, 16 May 2016 01:25:07 +0000
From: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
To: <dtn-interest@irtf.org>, <nikansell00@gmail.com>, <shyambs85@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] Bad Clock Vs. Clock rating (0)
Thread-Index: AQHRqzquFAImwPg+40eLqo6lytmB1Z+6y+Kk
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 01:25:07 +0000
Message-ID: <DB4PR06MB457D1863ABA5661AE4435FDAD770@DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAKLzrV9rkQqAzLqARmjqecTwYTKDN3RYO3dpq9ga-pgv9R4gtw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKLzrV9rkQqAzLqARmjqecTwYTKDN3RYO3dpq9ga-pgv9R4gtw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US
Content-Language: en-AU
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.192.208.66]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8f4179dd-a4e9-449e-a6e5-08d37d28ea7d
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB4PR06MB459; 5:j9OCfLWbensW8lPoDvHk/i1mrRs6cpDUJ6Nb6Ypza03vPwZoRpSjZUNewB86lNc85OuaD1SXPVKCjxkinVBk9jiaIKtb7Kjkq5ivLa5ZLqrd1RdketAxTi9jZnWqr+9UG5NcotevGYB2ggLgvs+ZKw==; 24:rgAwuqwg72ByaUkaoLE4golGWTX8O30Zddtoc6Re6iVM7YYfvYuGlLlIarjwnJ+kqFJ3qFw8sQ8WqBUHGgLMuVQcjlWz0jz0zHUlQJwlnU4=; 7:f0nwsMbN7oKGK/8epeBcLr8bKXybWVvrK51ZaONtKh4i1LFYQQ3/P451bwAi45Ok4Lp/0B3M8dYDBsJK1SeMXsEDjyN3hTSSQsfkt57Qr9kC1LlYMBfrGptIYK71U5PuluFX8GiciamNevzMO3xAgD2FLJ/remLUQ+wuQGqQ5DCNxp4HR8yfKvEz9D6Iv6QQ
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB459;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB4PR06MB45918508A569179642E396FAD770@DB4PR06MB459.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:DB4PR06MB459; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB4PR06MB459;
x-forefront-prvs: 09443CAA7E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(377454003)(27574002)(71364002)(53754006)(377424004)(24454002)(22974007)(11100500001)(54356999)(107886002)(92566002)(5004730100002)(76576001)(5001770100001)(5002640100001)(586003)(189998001)(5008740100001)(50986999)(76176999)(16236675004)(15975445007)(15198665003)(102836003)(2906002)(2201001)(1220700001)(86362001)(8676002)(9686002)(81166006)(87936001)(66066001)(2501003)(19625215002)(10400500002)(74482002)(77096005)(5003600100002)(2900100001)(2950100001)(15395725005)(33656002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(8936002)(19617315012)(19627405001)(74316001)(122556002)(106116001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR06MB459; H:DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB4PR06MB457D1863ABA5661AE4435FDAD770DB4PR06MB457eurprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 May 2016 01:25:07.1263 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 6b902693-1074-40aa-9e21-d89446a2ebb5
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR06MB459
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: DB4PR06MB459.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: EXHY022v.surrey.ac.uk
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/QVjLzjGXVIa34JJP1F1wtHVdyaE>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Bad Clock Vs. Clock rating (0)
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 01:25:15 -0000

Five years ago we pointed out the fundamental problems with the bundle protocol's reliance on clocks and synchronization in our 'A Bundle of Problems' paper.


http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/dtn/bundle.html

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2009.4839384


People are still trying to use it and work around its clocking? As Australians say: so tragic.
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2009.4839384>



Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________
From: dtn-interest <dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org> on behalf of Nik Ansell <nikansell00@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 11 May 2016 2:07:49 PM
To: dtn-interest@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Bad Clock Vs. Clock rating (0)

A good way to get in touch with the IBR-DTN guys is to use the mailing list below.

ibr-dtn@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de<mailto:ibr-dtn@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>

The main admin page for the mailing list is here: https://mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/mailman/listinfo/ibr-dtn

Kind Regards,
Nik

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:00 PM, <dtn-interest-request@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org>> wrote:
Send dtn-interest mailing list submissions to
        dtn-interest@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        dtn-interest-request@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org>

You can reach the person managing the list at
        dtn-interest-owner@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-interest-owner@irtf.org>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dtn-interest digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Bad Clock Vs. Clock rating (0) (Joerg Ott)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joerg Ott <jo@netlab.tkk.fi<mailto:jo@netlab.tkk.fi>>
To: Shyam B <shyambs85@gmail.com<mailto:shyambs85@gmail.com>>, dtn-interest@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Cc: kfall@kfall.com<mailto:kfall@kfall.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 07:19:16 +0200
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Bad Clock Vs. Clock rating (0)
I wo?ld ask the IBR-DTN folks...

On 10.05.16 01:37, Shyam B wrote:
Hello All,

Thanks for the evolving community of DTN. I hope someone can help me
with the questions below:

How to remove time synchronization between nodes on later versions of
IBRDTN:
We are using the latest version(s) of IBRDTN on OpenWRT. I read from the
change log "Version 1.0.1 (2015-02-24)" that BAD CLOCK has been replaced
by something called clock rating (set to 0).

1) I would like to know where and how can I set this clock rating to 0
on a node? Is it to be set in the "ibrdtn.conf" file or somewhere else -
any specifics will be helpful.

2) I believe this will need to be set "on each node" and the dtnd daemon
would read this during its initiation at run-time to bypass any clock
synchronization needed to receive bundles/ as well as dtnping, am I right?

NOTE: We do not require clock synchronization to keeping our scenarios
simple. Just need a way to pass bundles between nodes "under any
circumstance".

Reference:
https://trac.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/project-cm-2012-ibrdtn/wiki/changelog

Thanks for your time. Hope someone can help us soon!

--
Regards,
Shyam, B




_______________________________________________
dtn-interest mailing list
dtn-interest@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest