IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] RG "last call" on draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> Wed, 11 March 2009 04:05 UTC

Received: from mail82.messagelabs.com (mail82.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.67]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n2B45q8s018053 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:05:52 -0700
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-82.messagelabs.com!1236743286!83113336!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.102.140]
Received: (qmail 2668 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2009 03:48:06 -0000
Received: from ads40.surrey.ac.uk (HELO ads40.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.102.140) by server-4.tower-82.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2009 03:48:06 -0000
Received: from EVS-EC1-NODE4.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.102.139]) by ads40.surrey.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:48:05 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9A1FC.2F4FBF84"
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:48:05 -0000
Message-ID: <4835AFD53A246A40A3B8DA85D658C4BE7B0F28@EVS-EC1-NODE4.surrey.ac.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] RG "last call" on draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe
Thread-Index: Acmh2kY4KqtSXxeXRROmpemFL5jRjgAH+Z7r
References: <49B01FCB.2010405@cs.tcd.ie> <49B6F6F6.8040209@cs.tcd.ie>
From: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2009 03:48:05.0994 (UTC) FILETIME=[2FA4F4A0:01C9A1FC]
Cc: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] RG "last call" on draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:05:54 -0000

> #0, I guess I'm left wondering if this is the only spec needed to implement a
> CL for space DTNs? If so, cool. If not, would it be better if it were?

Stephen,

weren't you in Minneapolis, where two very different approaches to space DTNs
and implementations, using two different convergence layers - based on LTP
(over CFDP over CCSDS) and based on Saratoga (over UDP/IP over HDLC) - 
were presented, based on actual in-space testing results?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wood-dtnrg-saratoga

The presentations there are a clear indication that more than the cbhe spec
is needed to implement a convergence layer for space.

Perhaps you could look at finalising the meeting minutes (draft not archived) or
finalising the proceedings of the Minneapolis meeting (draft very hard
to find) to refresh your memory.

hope this helps,

L.

DTN work: http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/saratoga/

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>



-----Original Message-----
From: dtn-interest-bounces@maillists.intel-research.net on behalf of Stephen Farrell
Sent: Tue 2009-03-10 23:25
To: Stephen Farrell
Cc: DTN
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] RG "last call" on draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe
 

My comments on this one. Sorry if they overlap with earlier
ones,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email