IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] RG "last call" on draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv

"Burleigh, Scott C" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Fri, 20 February 2009 17:13 UTC

Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (sentrion2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.106]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1KHDG8v015119 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:13:17 -0800
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by mail.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.3.2mp/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id n1KH0CV5015872 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:02:57 GMT
Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP10.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.80]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:04:16 -0800
From: "Burleigh, Scott C" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Wesley Eddy <weddy@grc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:02:31 -0800
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] RG "last call" on draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv
Thread-Index: AcmSjWtfK79Xx7XkQ+u/9/Glwaz86gA7yzkw
Message-ID: <FD514C8A5155C64C9B145B48D674EF544951CD9F7E@ALTPHYEMBEVSP10.RES.AD.JPL>
References: <499B035A.9030803@cs.tcd.ie> <499D48C0.7080902@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <499D48C0.7080902@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by maillists.intel-research.net id n1KHDG8v015119
Cc: DTN <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] RG "last call" on draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:13:17 -0000

Stephen, I agree; ready to go.  One additional nit: in the first sentence of the 5th paragraph of section 4, I think the word "that" should be removed, i.e.: "The advantage in ease of parsing the old format manifests itself in two aspects...".

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dtn-interest-bounces@maillists.intel-research.net [mailto:dtn-
> interest-bounces@maillists.intel-research.net] On Behalf Of Stephen
> Farrell
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:56 AM
> To: Wesley Eddy
> Cc: DTN
> Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] RG "last call" on draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv
> 
> 
> So I think this is ready-to-go, but nonetheless have a few comments
> (attached) that Wes can take or leave as he wishes.
> 
> The only one I'd possibly argue about is #1 - the draft does seem to be
> missing a clear statement for developers as to which text is normative
> for SDNVs, but even that I consider non-blocking.
> 
> Stephen.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email