IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] wg adoption of draft-burleigh-dtn-bibect

"Burleigh, Scott C (312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Mon, 30 July 2018 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3638131053 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QpgVY-76OKln for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (sentrion2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D4F124D68 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (ap-embx16-sp10.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.83]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id w6UEqXSW010471 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128 bits) verified OK); Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:52:33 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1415.2; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:52:35 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b]) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b%17]) with mapi id 15.01.1415.002; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:52:35 -0700
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn] wg adoption of draft-burleigh-dtn-bibect
Thread-Index: AQHUH5MoOL4dojAyKUy+CrqOSXCaGqSoXjCA//+MeiA=
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:52:35 +0000
Message-ID: <145c30d794454091b852dda443d6f6a3@jpl.nasa.gov>
References: <7D5E9463-2B15-4806-98E5-5F857182D527@viagenie.ca> <BB3E507C-43C6-49A6-99F1-5C16DBFA1CA3@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <BB3E507C-43C6-49A6-99F1-5C16DBFA1CA3@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [207.151.104.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/5LYFo3HbSFdfKj7GHaFCnwooHb0>
Subject: Re: [dtn] wg adoption of draft-burleigh-dtn-bibect
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:52:36 -0000

I'll do that today.  Thanks.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> 
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 7:46 AM
To: dtn@ietf.org; Burleigh, Scott C (312B) <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [dtn] wg adoption of draft-burleigh-dtn-bibect

having received no opposition, this document is now a working group document. Scott, please resubmit as draft-ietf-dtn-bibect

Regards, Marc.

On 19 Jul 2018, at 15:01, Marc Blanchet wrote:

> Hello,
>  during the wg session today, it has been agreed to adopt 
> draft-burleigh-dtn-bibect as wg document. Recall that this 
> functionality was in RFC5050, but was extracted out BPbis base spec.
> Therefore, this functionality is within the dtn current charter.
>  please speak up by july 30th if you disagree on adopting this 
> document as wg document, by replying to this email to the mailing 
> list.
>
> Marc&Rick, dtn co-chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email