[dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9172 (7672)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 10 October 2023 20:06 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3927BC15107E for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ZvW-jU0IDyy for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63309C151082 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 35ECCE629D; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: edward.birrane@jhuapl.edu, ken.mckeever@jhuapl.edu, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com, edward.birrane@jhuapl.edu, rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: brian.sipos+ietf@gmail.com, dtn@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231010200608.35ECCE629D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:06:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/IjtEZiyMpB2FJxdA2wZ6z07k6sQ>
Subject: [dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9172 (7672)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 20:06:12 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9172, "Bundle Protocol Security (BPSec)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7672 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Brian Sipos <brian.sipos+ietf@gmail.com> Section: 3.6 Original Text ------------- Security Context Id: This field identifies the security context used to implement the security service represented by this block and applied to each security target. This field SHALL be represented by a CBOR unsigned integer. The values for this Id should come from the registry defined in Section 11.3. Corrected Text -------------- Security Context Id: This field identifies the security context used to implement the security service represented by this block and applied to each security target. This field SHALL be represented by a CBOR unsigned or negative integer. The values for this Id should come from the registry defined in Section 11.3. Notes ----- Per the IANA sub-registry in Section 11.3 the Context ID has "The value range: signed 16-bit integer." and negative values are reserved for private use, so the value can be either an unsigned or a negative integer. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9172 (draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-27) -------------------------------------- Title : Bundle Protocol Security (BPSec) Publication Date : January 2022 Author(s) : E. Birrane, III, K. McKeever Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dtn] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9172 (7672) RFC Errata System