[dtn] BPSec Default SC example issues
"Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu> Wed, 24 November 2021 21:55 UTC
Return-Path: <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BB53A0C8E for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:55:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jhuapl.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SwWG7mY-zfxE for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aplegw01.jhuapl.edu (aplegw01.jhuapl.edu [128.244.251.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C92BB3A0C8C for <dtn@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (aplegw01.jhuapl.edu [127.0.0.1]) by aplegw01.jhuapl.edu (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1AOLtY25185822 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:55:34 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhuapl.edu; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=JHUAPLDec2018; bh=s9dQvZ22OwOLTLLLbLSb/OUQebmXoDdTwmVsm/HUfzE=; b=UGOnYALM3Lxc9wYuLSBPGndsVFM47C6ccI52EOUsAwKINRxn/hevN2RG22Lx+1DAmILE zG/RNYZ517PuzuPimCKo/TplHWjMqUpwhzBjOTYECmcMKFGTe9ywEAY1YRGv0n+DyUoZ WIK9FDkxdPUGDgDh5BUeAvr3gdz8kOdQgjCMwHN3P7slzJMk+7mUev7D4LfvQvJTtfTp H49e+eLCsgcS+kfooDowkCO863ZqmMfNcyHvoLDUFlW1qq7EgOS9deXh2Jv6m23+cYyl B+ozUq95Rk7XRbih8zDouJymt3+Y4GyaKNyV5Zdpnwa6x8Px4/jyFpmEhT1hTAvUIBXr ag==
Received: from aplex27.dom1.jhuapl.edu (aplex27.dom1.jhuapl.edu [10.114.162.12]) by aplegw01.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 3ch0431997-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dtn@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:55:34 -0500
Received: from APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.6) by APLEX27.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.13; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:55:34 -0500
Received: from APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::3c73:f90:20fa:eda1]) by APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::3c73:f90:20fa:eda1%5]) with mapi id 15.02.0922.013; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:55:34 -0500
From: "Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>
To: "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BPSec Default SC example issues
Thread-Index: AdfhfHdAq6iFkGTVRceunLpHKOOMeg==
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:55:34 +0000
Message-ID: <0829355197834d8f9671b7ac3f4c8bc8@jhuapl.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.162.26]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02AE_01D7E154.18165C20"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: APLEX27.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: APLEX27.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-11-24_06:2021-11-23, 2021-11-24 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/XZSE9eDHzLrZaEnVKML4snZe_zI>
Subject: [dtn] BPSec Default SC example issues
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:55:41 -0000
All, I confirmed this with the authors of the default-sc draft [1], and am posting here to help anyone using the examples before they can be fixed before publication. Each of the abstract security block structures in the examples is missing the second layer of the results portion (the array of results for an individual target). It has the first layer (array with each item corresponding to a target) and the third layer (two-tuple of a single result type-and-value) with valid sizes and contents. Each of the examples contain one result-per-target so the second-layer arrays should all contain a single item (a single two-tuple). This is consistent with the structure in Figure 2 of BPSec [2]. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-default-sc-11 [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-27#page-16
- [dtn] BPSec Default SC example issues Sipos, Brian J.
- Re: [dtn] BPSec Default SC example issues Birrane, Edward J.