Re: [dtn] WG Subject Lines

[[e-mail]]

Hi Ed,

Thanks for this detailed clarification!

Scott


On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Birrane, Edward J. wrote:

> Scott J.,
>
>  Moving the discussion on subject naming to an easier to track subject name.
>
>> As a matter of process, is it not general practice to notably and
>> prominently include [Last-Call] in the subject of any mail making a last
>> call announcement concerning a draft, as below, or is that a function of
>> datatracker for the ietf-announce list, or something that comes later in
>> the process?
>>
>> Subject: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-20
>
> There is not a requirement for naming subjects in this way at the WG level.  For example:
>
> Subject: WG Last Call: IPN URI Scheme (April 16th - May 4th, 2023)
> Subject: WGLC consensus on draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-04.txt
>
> Neither of these subject lines conform to that practice (and that is OK).
>
> The convention you are referring to is applied later in the process. The archive of IETF last calls can be found at: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/. If you search on bpbis or bpsec you can see the history of these documents after they left WG review.
>
> -Ed
>
> ---
> Edward J. Birrane, III, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
> Chief Engineer, Space Constellation Networking
> Supervisor, Embedded Applications Group
> Space Exploration Sector
> Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory
> (W) 443-778-7423 / (F) 443-228-3839
>  
>