Re: [dtn] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-default-sc-10: (with COMMENT)
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 15 July 2021 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C873A1066; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlSBQniOBHkJ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F249A3A105A; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id q20so2300020uaa.3; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZLoiy7nI8XViTK7fHuvhec954hFeOoOJM3db8QUdxFY=; b=FT2dcmOWV0b/GQ2yjkifRkeb7XJf6l/9MiPXMqCHPqkMdObgWBy7EOzYnO8T5LiWXk CcEmeKSuMy9KaV+zNG9w40JI95zLZMbLavIxq/irSXiTchJkqEyxWNSgeKi0j1Rya05J /2F75v1igHegKOfIZwFqPSIYAZr2mIvGJsN03Jx0K+NbHlSLntHtdDJNRKA8YiPajGGB 1NxqPTTY5iFaNCMAtaLXIQJN9rbHd3OBe4ySy7NTMZ/GiaKUrJiiV91utRlBt2hapQAQ XRl9Qjl03vjn4PKFPg5Ig5WJJM3YpOOTb9lbuH3ACpypMgYeQtNGeXvnZW5cQakRRd3U vSlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZLoiy7nI8XViTK7fHuvhec954hFeOoOJM3db8QUdxFY=; b=k/cD5q40QfuiXsh2ji5B5PAWdJhUwu572r53yD8w/2Z19sVu6siZEpo2BaZiObqIN4 uOtf7iOvq89AoPfNwFuO9sDWvEKViOMMZu1iLLSKJg3xDpBqJ04/Nu/HhA82fzxlQ1p/ sIkyWhhYvxF57WyDu8XtC5wxtmi9N2Pxitu3Zifg4GRDjXNCR/WwyrUH7FBJFtJArHlL taSxnPnXNWtSnwDKTTz7q/0gpVDrhkccXx+cupw87zRA8xjO2PIi3qmIF4Aolh3+da7v HT8fYfZYenQwJRBiu0hGOZa/uYY4pyZOSTZd7hxu+HiqU9i5I3KLFU5ZtBNdwFwJTVRX y5kQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vXkDene4XvhIgEz9LYo0+pYp0zrrbFzbOjKluWcPtUZRkosjB So5WZzB3xnhdq58bPtsw5aaxy9viVt6UB5FF1HA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1JLScBcyV2U1p8r8Sn1ej2Up4xOrItjlhGTHDMzQXFmy4ky7I5Ky9mRv98BVbv7/fKJENM51KePnH1wM+mpU=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7305:: with SMTP id v5mr8040906uao.47.1626364648480; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162636004045.29436.13632115882811845463@ietfa.amsl.com> <532E9DD8-1E04-4833-A689-DAFC937F75A2@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <532E9DD8-1E04-4833-A689-DAFC937F75A2@ericsson.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:57:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYB4W3q3hNUCXd2kymm0cwMc0iyTo+gU3xxoVsLwL_DFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "dtn-chairs@ietf.org" <dtn-chairs@ietf.org>, "Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov" <Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, "draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-default-sc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-default-sc@ietf.org>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000025e45005c72b87f4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/htz8SrHm6nzVzouTAKM6_CgbDQI>
Subject: Re: [dtn] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-default-sc-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:57:38 -0000
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 8:33 AM Zaheduzzaman Sarker < zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com> wrote: > The last bullet on the section 5.4 is in question here. It says - > > "Verify that any specification produced in the IETF has been made > available for review by the DTN working group and that any > specification produced outside of the IETF does not conflict with > work that is active or already published within the IETF." > > I think we can just remove this bullet. All the specifications will go > through IETF last call, telechat to pick up the review and conflicts, and > the IESG can pick experts for the review if needed in case DTN is not > there. Hence no need to imposing an explicit review by the DTN WG. > That works for me. -MSK
- [dtn] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ie… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [dtn] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draf… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [dtn] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draf… Murray S. Kucherawy