Re: [dtn] summary of work items
"Sheehe, Charles J. (GRC-LCA0)" <charles.j.sheehe@nasa.gov> Thu, 11 December 2014 18:24 UTC
Return-Path: <charles.j.sheehe@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2BC1A8793 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:24:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtVlMfQuxnla for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:24:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ndmsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov [IPv6:2001:4d0:8302:1100::103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385F71A8791 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:24:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ndjsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.198]) by ndmsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824421824B9; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:24:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: from NDJSCHT105.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjscht105-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.205]) by ndjsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBBIONG5027810; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:24:23 -0600
Received: from NDJSMBX202.ndc.nasa.gov ([169.254.2.104]) by NDJSCHT105.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.205]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:24:23 -0600
From: "Sheehe, Charles J. (GRC-LCA0)" <charles.j.sheehe@nasa.gov>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn] summary of work items
Thread-Index: AQHQFU9RHx97S6DhkEC/q2SymsR4DpyLEpkA//+dNCA=
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:24:22 +0000
Message-ID: <2D5292B061A3D547B3D87C3841793B3006863566@NDJSMBX202.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <C2517A15-B719-443F-8089-16E0958BE600@viagenie.ca> <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B5F96E1BB@ap-embx-sp10.RES.AD.JPL>
In-Reply-To: <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B5F96E1BB@ap-embx-sp10.RES.AD.JPL>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [139.88.44.182]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68, 1.0.33, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-12-11_05:2014-12-11,2014-12-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/l7KoaDFXmjk4D4y-CmC7Tmzo-rE
Subject: Re: [dtn] summary of work items
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:24:25 -0000
I agree with your work plan. My concerned with the security not being an afterthought. Payload integrity and e2e integrity should be mindful of confidentiality / authentication and keys management. Thanks Chuck Charles J. Sheehe III Electronics Engineer System Architectures and Networks Branch 21000 Brookpark Rd Cleveland, OH 44135 Charles.J.Sheehe@nasa.gov Office: 216-433-5179 -----Original Message----- From: dtn [mailto:dtn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Burleigh, Scott C (312B) Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 1:00 PM To: Marc Blanchet; dtn@ietf.org Subject: Re: [dtn] summary of work items Hi, Marc and Brian. I agree this is a very good summary. I will offer a couple of proposed tweaks, marked in <> brackets in-line below. Scott From: dtn [mailto:dtn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marc Blanchet Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:33 AM To: dtn@ietf.org Subject: [dtn] summary of work items Hello, Brian and I have worked on a summary of the work items that were discussed during our interim meeting last week. We hope this reflects our discussion. We would like to make sure this summary is appropriate before sending it to our AD. So please review and confirm. The intent of this email is _not_ to discuss each work items, but to review if the list is ok. Regards, Marc&Brian ===================== DTN Work Items Phase 1 1. Header Integrity and Immutability <if "payload integrity" is included in this item then maybe the item title should be just "End-to-end Integrity" and item ii should be omitted?> * Status: DTN WG work item * Considerations: i. payload integrity ii. e2e integrity iii. immutability of primary block iv. remove dictionary <I suggest that we add "bundle size" here, removing it from Phase 2. I don't think bundle size is in fact an issue, but if it is an issue then it is fundamental and we need to address it at the beginning. Will has linked it to the design of the integrity mechanisms, so I think this work item is the right place for it.> 2. Improved Security * Status: DTN WG work item * Considerations: 0. Determine if SBSP is starting point i. Identify dependency on header changes driven by other work items <maybe just "Identify dependency on header changes"? Because the security improvements may themselves be the drivers for some of those changes.> 3. Addressing * Status: DTN WG work item * Considerations: 0. develop requirements on addressing from use cases <I suggest that we consider "constrained environments" here rather than in item 8. So far in our conversations, I think constrained environments have had more impact on addressing than on any other topics.> i. narrow scope of work ii. Possible interim meeting 4. Node/Neighbor Discovery * Status: DTN WG work item * Considerations: 0. Investigate MANET discovery protocol model i. Assess applicability of draft-irtf-dtnrg-ipnd 5. Static Routing * Status: DTN WG work item * Considerations: 0. Assess relationship to node/neighbor discovery 6. Avoid Routing Loops * Status: DTN WG work item <suggested Considerations: assess applicability of draft-fall-dtnrg-schl-00> 7. Time and bundle expiration * Status: DTN WG work item <suggested Considerations: assess applicability of draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-age-block-01> 8. Improve Specifications such as RFC 5050 * Status: DTN WG work item * Considerations: 0. fix known specification bugs i. constrained environments <as noted above, I suggest we relocate this topic> ii. default operations iii. simplify options iv. identify issues for incompatibilities with 5050 9. Registry of Service Identifier * Status: DTN WG work item. Phase 2 (after phase 1 completed, potential work items below. list to be reviewed at that time) 1. Network Management * Network monitoring only, not configuration * Considerations: i. Potentially interface with LIME WG ii. Move configuration to DTNRG? 2. Key management 3. Extended Class of Service 4. Multicast 5. Streaming Support 6. Bundle size <as noted above, I suggest we relocate this topic> Non Work Items 1. Dynamic Routing * Status: suggesting DTNRG
- [dtn] summary of work items Marc Blanchet
- Re: [dtn] summary of work items Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dtn] summary of work items Ivancic, William D. (GRC-LCA0)
- Re: [dtn] summary of work items Marc Blanchet
- Re: [dtn] summary of work items Burleigh, Scott C (312B)
- Re: [dtn] summary of work items Sheehe, Charles J. (GRC-LCA0)