Re: [e2md] Proposed agenda change for E2md at Anaheim

Well #3 for 10 min given the time frame strikes me as "end world hunger
issues". You can make a case that alternatively that SIP signaling itself
might be another way to transport metadata this but we seem to be
restraining ourselves to public and private DNS methodologies first which is
OK with me.

I'm very weary of discussions that could drift into policy. 

-----Original Message-----
From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dean
Willis
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:33 PM
To: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list
Cc: Robert Sparks; Gonzalo Camarillo
Subject: [e2md] Proposed agenda change for E2md at Anaheim

Bernie and I discussed the agenda yesterday with the ADs. We are  
considering the following alternative structure for the agenda due to  
the severe time constraints.

What do you folks think?

-------

AGENDA:

1. Administrivia (Chairs, 5 min)
   * Note takers, Jabber scribes
   * Agenda bashing

2. Problem Statement and Example Use Cases -- Bernie, 10 min
     (one slide per topic)
   * General problem statement:    draft-hoeneisen-e164-to-metadata-02
   * unused/void:  draft-ietf-enum-unused-04
   * cnam:  draft-ietf-enum-cnam-08
   * send-n:  draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02

3. Open Issues with E2MD -- Dean, 10 min
    * Issues of DNS characteristics and metadata
         Cacheing properties
         Distribution latency / propagation
         "Globally" interesting (no localized queries)
    * Privacy issues:
         Is the DNS the "right place" for all metadata?
         Can we bound the metadata for public use?
         Can we constrain this with an applicability statement?

3. Open discussion on issues -- 15 min

4. Discussion of Charter -- Bernie -- 15 min

5. Conclusions and polls -- Chairs -- 5 min
_______________________________________________
e2md mailing list
e2md@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md