Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list

Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk> Sat, 02 April 2011 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BD428C13D for <e2md@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCT6L6U8hQVN for <e2md@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from insensate.co.uk (ghost.insensate.co.uk [213.152.49.121]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AF728C13A for <e2md@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2317E36A998; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:26:06 +0100 (BST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at insensate.co.uk
Received: from insensate.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psyche.insensate.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wrhCMUOAbhya; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:26:04 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8FD36A98D; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:26:03 +0100 (BST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B0623C2E6@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:26:03 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A3D8BA88-27A9-4ED8-815D-D432F70DBC0D@insensate.co.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104011504250.31701@softronics.hoeneisen.ch><E5F1533A-68CF-4497-AEDC-1374DA975279@rfc1035.com> <000001cbf07f$79e84890$6db8d9b0$@us> <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B0623C2E6@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com>
To: "PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)" <pp3129@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list" <e2md@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list
X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" <e2md.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/e2md>
List-Post: <mailto:e2md@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:24:28 -0000

Kill it.
BTW, not just TXT records it's a domain so anything will fit.
-- there are always P- Enumservices, with data: URLs. Both are already kinda "legal".
This doesn't need further effort/pain in the IETF.
atb,
  Lawrence



On 1 Apr 2011, at 17:35, PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP) wrote:
> Amen.
> And whatever happens there are always TXT records :-)
> 
> Penn Pfautz
> AT&T Access Management
> +1-732-420-4962
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Richard Shockey
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:14 AM
> To: 'Jim Reid'
> Cc: 'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list'
> Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list
> 
> Close it .. the underlying issues are not going away since there is a
> very
> active discussion going on in North America about the end of TDM/POTS.
> When
> it needs to be resurrected it will have to restart with a clean slate.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Jim
> Reid
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:15 AM
> To: Bernie Hoeneisen
> Cc: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list
> Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list
> 
> On 1 Apr 2011, at 14:13, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:
> 
>> After the ENUM WG has been concluded there is also the question,  
>> what we shall do with the E2MD mailing list. The current proposal is  
>> to close the E2MD mailing list
> 
> The list has been quiet for about a year. The shutdown of the ENUM WG  
> means this list probably has no justification to continue. So Bernie,  
> I think this is the right time for the e2md list's funeral. Let's  
> declare victory and go for a beer.
> _______________________________________________
> e2md mailing list
> e2md@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md
> 
> _______________________________________________
> e2md mailing list
> e2md@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md
> _______________________________________________
> e2md mailing list
> e2md@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md