Re: [Ecrit] [Fwd: [secdir] Draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-04.txt]
Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Mon, 20 August 2007 14:17 UTC
Return-path: <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IN84K-0005Mh-M7; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:17:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IN84J-0005JX-IO for ecrit@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:17:23 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IN84H-0006H7-40 for ecrit@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:17:22 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2007 14:17:19 -0000
Received: from socks1.netz.sbs.de (EHLO [192.35.17.26]) [192.35.17.26] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 20 Aug 2007 16:17:19 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18QEyJDWoQQl4b9L9OSwOwDFheoeR2mPwfDekQ5+E 5QqkMMuFfmNqSI
Message-ID: <46C9A264.70209@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:17:08 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] [Fwd: [secdir] Draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-04.txt]
References: <46C4B65A.60405@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <46C4B65A.60405@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ecrit.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Donald, thanks for your review. It is good to hear that you found the document reasonably complete. Ciao Hannes Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Security Area Directorate Review -- got lost in my inbox somehow > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [secdir] Draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-04.txt > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:57:28 -0400 > From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> > To: <iesg@ietf.org>, <secdir@mit.edu> > CC: ecrit-chairs@tools.ietf.org > > > > This draft reviews threats to the marking of message to indicate they > relate to an emergency call (911) and the process of mapping from a > location to the URI for the appropriate Public Safety Answering Point. > > The document seemed to be a reasonably complete survey of the threats, > limited to the scope of the ECRIT working group. The draft also does a > good job of enumerating high level security requirements derived from > these threats. It does not get down to the level of algorithm strength > or work factor requirements. > > Overall, it seems like a fine document. I wasn't even able to find any > editorial nits in it :-( > > Donald > > ==================================================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-786-7554 (work) > 111 Locke Drive > Marlborough, MA 01752 USA > Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com > > _______________________________________________ > secdir mailing list > secdir@mit.edu > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/secdir > > > _______________________________________________ > Ecrit mailing list > Ecrit@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
- [Ecrit] [Fwd: [secdir] Draft-ietf-ecrit-security-… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] [Fwd: [secdir] Draft-ietf-ecrit-secur… Hannes Tschofenig