Re: [Ecrit] [Fwd: [secdir] Draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-04.txt]

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Mon, 20 August 2007 14:17 UTC

Return-path: <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IN84K-0005Mh-M7; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:17:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IN84J-0005JX-IO for ecrit@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:17:23 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IN84H-0006H7-40 for ecrit@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:17:22 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2007 14:17:19 -0000
Received: from socks1.netz.sbs.de (EHLO [192.35.17.26]) [192.35.17.26] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 20 Aug 2007 16:17:19 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18QEyJDWoQQl4b9L9OSwOwDFheoeR2mPwfDekQ5+E 5QqkMMuFfmNqSI
Message-ID: <46C9A264.70209@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:17:08 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] [Fwd: [secdir] Draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-04.txt]
References: <46C4B65A.60405@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <46C4B65A.60405@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ecrit.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Donald,

thanks for your review. It is good to hear that you found the document 
reasonably complete.

Ciao
Hannes

Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Security Area Directorate Review -- got lost in my inbox somehow
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     [secdir] Draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-04.txt
> Date:     Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:57:28 -0400
> From:     Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
> To:     <iesg@ietf.org>, <secdir@mit.edu>
> CC:     ecrit-chairs@tools.ietf.org
>
>
>
> This draft reviews threats to the marking of message to indicate they
> relate to an emergency call (911) and the process of mapping from a
> location to the URI for the appropriate Public Safety Answering Point.
>
> The document seemed to be a reasonably complete survey of the threats,
> limited to the scope of the ECRIT working group. The draft also does a
> good job of enumerating high level security requirements derived from
> these threats. It does not get down to the level of algorithm strength
> or work factor requirements.
>
> Overall, it seems like a fine document. I wasn't even able to find any
> editorial nits in it :-(
>
> Donald
>
> ====================================================
> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd      +1-508-786-7554 (work)
> 111 Locke Drive
> Marlborough, MA 01752 USA
> Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/secdir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit


_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit