[Ecrit] Ecrit issue 9 - lack of static vs. dynamic
"Roger Marshall" <RMarshall@telecomsys.com> Sun, 15 January 2006 19:03 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EyD9x-0000UC-6B; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:03:25 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EyD5F-00065N-ES for ecrit@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:58:33 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA16802 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:15:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sea-mailsweep-1.telecomsys.com ([206.173.41.176]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExfDV-00049C-U5 for ecrit@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:48:53 -0500
Received: from SEA-EXCHVS-2.telecomsys.com (unverified [10.32.12.6]) by sea-mailsweep-1.telecomsys.com (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.0.9) with ESMTP id <T75d25661d40a2000491298@sea-mailsweep-1.telecomsys.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:40:50 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:40:49 -0800
Message-ID: <8C837214C95C864C9F34F3635C2A65750401BB9A@SEA-EXCHVS-2.telecomsys.com>
Thread-Topic: Ecrit issue 9 - lack of static vs. dynamic
Thread-Index: AcVbsALZkh1dj3P6RfGFzFMZn5VDyx5UwR0gEPJfGtAAAf5PIA==
From: Roger Marshall <RMarshall@telecomsys.com>
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, ecrit@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Hannes.Tschofenig@siemens.com
Subject: [Ecrit] Ecrit issue 9 - lack of static vs. dynamic
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ecrit.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Issue 9 (ref. http://www.ietf-ecrit.org:8080/ecrit-req/issue9), states: "There are no requirements for static vs. dynamic routing as specified by draft- polk-newton-ecrit-arch-considerations-00.txt." I question why it is necessary that this is addressed in the requirements document. I propose that this issue be marked resolved unless the group pursues additional discussion/clarification/contributions around this topic. Roger Marshall. _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
- [Ecrit] Ecrit issue 9 - lack of static vs. dynamic Roger Marshall