Re: [Ecrit] Request for Agenda Items

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Tue, 17 June 2008 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ecrit-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3CF3A6B72; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969263A6B72 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Krgub7typO5O for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CAC3A6900 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,660,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="32777088"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2008 14:12:40 -0700
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5HLCetY012986; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:12:40 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5HLCenx009092; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:12:40 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:12:40 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com ([10.21.78.55]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:12:39 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:12:39 -0500
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, 'ECRIT' <ecrit@ietf.org>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <48580FE7.9010302@gmx.net>
References: <48580FE7.9010302@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-2128o3fqEIu0000b5d8@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jun 2008 21:12:39.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[DFF33200:01C8D0BE]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1073; t=1213737160; x=1214601160; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Ecrit]=20Request=20for=20Agenda=20Item s |Sender:=20; bh=uv+7OOhpgLAxwrT1zJ80SjiUSe32c5v/msuST00l/J4=; b=mmcS5UNBsWmyHBdaXBSLdpfbT5MRjEdUIZoDFwstKum/Tn5BqF2M9yOdi+ IY1N/Y7jnBqjA42w8lq+R/R4GxQEyihrSPT8hzW+Kho1YclHuNV0kuonddWg y0+1E6rRnw;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Request for Agenda Items
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org

At 02:26 PM 6/17/2008, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>we need to prepare the agenda for the meeting. Please let me know what
>you believe we should definitely discuss or shouldn't discuss anymore.

I'd like to know about this ID
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-02.txt

I was tasked with neutering it to only work inside an ESInet, yet 
3GPP wants to be able to use this within their networks by the P- and 
E-(CSCFs) because they control their infrastructure.  This is 
mentioned in the above -02, but that's not what Ted recommended I do 
with the doc.

The SIP WG chair has discussed taking this work on while maintaining 
the 3GPP requirements (stated above).  Does this become something 
that isn't blessed by ECRIT yet still progresses towards publication?

(this is not a threat - btw, as I'd prefer this be a ECRIT effort)

James


>Ciao
>Hannes
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit