[Ecrit] draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-01

"Caron, Guy (A162859)" <g.caron@bell.ca> Thu, 09 July 2015 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <g.caron@bell.ca>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742121A03C7 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phtShPBOYJK6 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta7.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta7.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED7B1A03B3 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [216.82.253.147] by server-5.bemta-7.messagelabs.com id D7/1F-08719-648EE955; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 21:31:50 +0000
X-Env-Sender: g.caron@bell.ca
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-165.messagelabs.com!1436477509!24417137!2
X-Originating-IP: [67.69.230.132]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.13.16; banners=bell.ca,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 654 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2015 21:31:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Tls.exchange.bell.ca) (67.69.230.132) by server-7.tower-165.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jul 2015 21:31:50 -0000
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: EX13EDGE01-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca
Received: from DG1MBX01-DOR.bell.corp.bce.ca (142.117.209.14) by EX13EDGE01-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (198.235.68.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 17:28:02 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX01-DOR.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8e75:d10e::8e75:d10e) by DG1MBX01-DOR.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8e75:d10e::8e75:d10e) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:31:34 -0500
Received: from DG1MBX01-DOR.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::203b:bd4d:1db7:f155]) by DG1MBX01-DOR.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::7164:652e:4dc6:420d%19]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.031; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:31:34 -0500
From: "Caron, Guy (A162859)" <g.caron@bell.ca>
To: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-01
Thread-Index: AdC6jqAhtJHtepFgRMyElLuhZqLMGg==
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 21:31:33 +0000
Message-ID: <764960384838414ab6e52182983603ee@DG1MBX01-DOR.bell.corp.bce.ca>
Accept-Language: fr-CA, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.24.25.1]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_764960384838414ab6e52182983603eeDG1MBX01DORbellcorpbcec_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: SoftFail (EX13EDGE01-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca: domain of transitioning g.caron@bell.ca discourages use of 142.117.209.14 as permitted sender)
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: EX13EDGE01-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/C55TXyIvC9EAh-k-89-wise0Tg0>
Subject: [Ecrit] draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-01
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 21:31:55 -0000

Hi ECRIT,

Someone pointed me to the above draft on which, for some reason, I missed the announcement when it was originally submitted. I read the draft and believe that the proposed mechanism has merits and would improve the current location validation process.

I would appreciate seeing this draft progressed in ECRIT.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-01

Thanks,

Guy Caron

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________