Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Milestone Update

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Wed, 03 June 2009 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0700F28C189; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.361, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11oY4V2hZths; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FA528C175; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,299,1241395200"; d="scan'208";a="36739919"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2009 16:57:58 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n53GvwpH027931; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:57:58 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n53GvwAr006923; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:57:58 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:57:58 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com ([10.89.9.214]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:57:57 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:57:56 -0500
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>, iesg-secretary@ietf.org
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450168486B@FIESEXC015.nsn-in tra.net>
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450168486B@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-211iXWm8OdY0000bebd@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2009 16:57:57.0869 (UTC) FILETIME=[721A31D0:01C9E46C]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2396; t=1244048278; x=1244912278; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Ecrit]=20ECRIT=20Milestone=20Update |Sender:=20; bh=xK8LqNb6mfEpyUJl2dJfJxEMWLM4T9wurqDVCiErT78=; b=ZyheI1gSjXWvuZkW4RkvY0UANSdjKTxR64winjxk0/RTXW9bxYliZUj4PF yYELe7kWvDOFYI8N3XkVrJD4qcoUxMeuPU2P2W64N2D/1GzgomXoWBnFpNEx NnORqtG09D;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Milestone Update
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:58:12 -0000

Hannes

Why do you continue to ignore the "esnet" Resource-Priority namespace 
ID in the milestones.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-03.txt

This became a WG item more than a year ago, and you stated the last 
time I pointed this omission out that you were in error.

James

At 03:32 AM 6/3/2009, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>Please update the milestones for the ECRIT working group:
>
>----------------------------------
>
>Goals and Milestones:
>
>Done            Submit 'Requirements for Emergency Context Resolution
>with Internet Technologies' to the IESG for consideration as an
>Informational RFC.
>
>Done            Submit 'Security Threats and Requirements for Emergency
>Call Marking and Mapping' to the IESG for consideration as an
>Informational RFC.
>
>Done            Submit 'A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and
>Other Well-Known Services' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed
>Standard.
>
>Done            Submit 'LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation
>Protocol' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard.
>
>Done            Submit 'Discovering Location-to-Service Translation
>(LoST) Servers Using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)' to
>the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC.
>
>Done            Submit 'Location-to-URL Mapping Architecture and
>Framework' to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC.
>
>Done     Submit 'Location Hiding: Problem Statement and Requirements' to
>the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC.
>
>Done     Submit 'Specifying Holes in LoST Service Boundaries' to the
>IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC.
>
>Jul 2009 Submit 'Synchronizing Location-to-Service Translation (LoST)
>Protocol based Service Boundaries and Mapping Elements' to the IESG for
>consideration as an Experimental RFC.
>
>Jul 2009                Submit 'Framework for Emergency Calling using
>Internet Multimedia' to the IESG for consideration as an Informational
>RFC.
>
>Jul 2009                Submit 'Best Current Practice for Communications
>Services in support of Emergency Calling' to the IESG for consideration
>as a BCP document
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit