[Ecrit] draft-barnes-ecrit-auth-00
Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> Thu, 12 July 2007 14:17 UTC
Return-path: <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8zTt-0004Bn-DM; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:17:21 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8zTs-0004Ai-CA for ecrit@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:17:20 -0400
Received: from mx12.bbn.com ([128.33.0.81]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8zTo-0003lZ-3s for ecrit@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:17:20 -0400
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mx12.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <rbarnes@bbn.com>) id 1I8zTn-00024z-5S for ecrit@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:17:15 -0400
Message-ID: <469637E9.8080209@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:17:13 -0400
From: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Subject: [Ecrit] draft-barnes-ecrit-auth-00
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ecrit.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
As a follow-up to my "VSP verification" ideas in the location-hiding debate, I've posted a new draft that proposes several options for authorized entities to assert, and for proxies to verify that a call is an emergency call. The draft treats the problem in two parts, (1) the "authenticator" used, i.e., the information that proves that the call is an emergency call, and (2) the SIP messages used to carry the authenticator. Three authenticators are presented, including the standard "location + service URN" authenticator as well as two cryptographic options. For the SIP embedding, I've declined to list specific proposals, and instead listed some requirements. The document is available at <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-ecrit-auth-00> Cheers, --Richard _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
- [Ecrit] draft-barnes-ecrit-auth-00 Richard Barnes