IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Milestone Clean-up, also: Editors: Action Needed

Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> Tue, 18 July 2017 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <br@brianrosen.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFC9131DE6 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cWIWgeTdZTXy for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x241.google.com (mail-qk0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93953131A67 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x241.google.com with SMTP id q66so1755651qki.1 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Sz8afUzAyVUsZTaATQQylMEBbZkx/XjOkIws9YkPPMw=; b=ZBfIIlislPsaiMRTxh2rpjvmVrUO1YpxB14VY5N3d+LJPr+AKOSktUp6kquuVGSN6g hiUxSkWXUOvyAROjCUsh7R+GaFO9pTfIY0cDQ8BTNrk1mqHtRCHXTH/pj35EPoiQfG5K /q2FX6W2P4Rtm5dK6dSjxpD/bSxUPIuHhlSPjE0uR6G0Ptaf0ONuQehr9BKJiWC2Ooqj JjE4UFe9PSLfssCBSWss6VXgwFsW6Fg11D8230d57V8LxY+RK3W+I135NsR5lxJqfaU5 cfQyIYJDWxDXW/9SB74S4bnucsWQAyaj1DAN5YF5FBPh8A/xFc3Mj5VfjksUDyp2y6hP NHFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Sz8afUzAyVUsZTaATQQylMEBbZkx/XjOkIws9YkPPMw=; b=iNiwBtXCKSuGNsyUo5xJdBMIBjEMqkg2iAAvmfVyntqWjt++SIqBRw2j/544DULGCy 2Q4HA13/4u+EDwB8ONXvnJmcSgYITQC02kQnattUnX07QWFSdfLe9AtpblZ1BuWespw7 6MZAhUJhlWGCQCM9lQ30lHiraooceF7Afy13jBWKKA5DXqHi021VK69B65wCvWiy7dp4 qk/23vGfKbkiyybH6zcdoTcyvvy7W6C4w2ow+Jugv1sJOuzLUafsQDMhNIFbQhBSD0bI uKpHwMiXyDTAIhTFhybi7e2SMKDNWHHYr/8qO1vmxJS3wGg28gEzLSSkk6XfWy/t6k6r Ehdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111bxnn/NzkK4RXdEHirdR3rOyg60SbyQkXBq1lk5YDQnGphEXaj J0MXJ39HmAZGHBbh
X-Received: by 10.55.75.210 with SMTP id y201mr995850qka.80.1500371569713; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.96.10.159] (neustar-sthide-nat1.neustar.biz. [156.154.81.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c18sm1258487qtd.62.2017.07.18.02.52.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Message-Id: <CF547C6F-735A-458B-A35D-555DFA3C3F43@brianrosen.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C6A7AB8E-3930-4A78-B4E9-9C8A525F5BBA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:52:45 +0200
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CC86F42@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Cc: Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "ecrit-chairs@ietf.org" <ecrit-chairs@ietf.org>, "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <CAP8yD=vMG42Uu2UoktK1RAN-hdgBCFYj+0eZLGGV13yD9FyQPQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CC86EE4@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <CAP8yD=tQ2+HwcnYnucaR1qTT_2StXbrSGNkETeAaeNLD5j40mg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CC86F42@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/L1xTSRPMJIEFa-BvoeqY-Ye_9zs>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Milestone Clean-up, also: Editors: Action Needed
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:52:55 -0000

I’d like to keep one draft that does all we need to clean this up.

My draft is currently informational, because all it has is instructions to IANA.
We can turn it into a PS and update 5031, but I don’t think we need to do that.  I think we can, in my draft (already adding Henning as a co-author, and Christer is welcome also) to update the advice to the expert reviewer, which I think we can do in an informational.  Note what Christer is asking for is not a protocol change; he wants a strong statement on uses for the sos tree.

Brian

> On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:42 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>  
> >Indeed. When do we expect these?
>  
> I would only author one of those, so I can only speak for that. It’s related to my earlier question on the mailing list whether we need to update RFC 5031, by clarifying that the sos tree is only used for emergency services, that non-emergency services uses other trees, and if there exists both an X emergency service and an X non-emergency service two URNs are needed (one in the sos tree and the other in another tree).
>  
> I will be on vacation for a few weeks after IETF, but I expect that the draft would be submitted soon after that.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Christer
>  
> On Jul 18, 2017 11:25, "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com <mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> Hi,
>  
> Please note the ongoing emergency URN discussions. There might be 1 or 2 drafts related to that coming in the near future.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Christer
>   <>
> From: Ecrit [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Allison Mankin
> Sent: 18 July 2017 09:49
> To: ecrit@ietf.org <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
> Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>>; ecrit-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:ecrit-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Ecrit] ECRIT Milestone Clean-up, also: Editors: Action Needed
>  
> Hi, all,
> 
> We need to wrap up our remaining ECRIT work, and as part of that, I just cleaned up the milestones, marked the recently published RFCs as DONE, and put August submission dates on our remaining drafts.  We will probably need to go into early Autumn, but let's see what we can do.
> 
> Roger and I would appreciate the editors of remaining drafts refreshing those (everything has expired) and sending a status email to the working group. 
> 
> Many thanks, and onward and upwards,
> 
> Allison and Roger
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email