[Ecrit] AI for Service URN Update

"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 11 November 2009 04:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DCF28C267 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.613, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iw7d9VpS7GoK for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A6FAC28C266 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2009 04:40:14 -0000
Received: from host-18-117.meeting.ietf.org (EHLO 4FIL42860) [133.93.18.117] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 05:40:14 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+L4/BaZVCLxyl7IkJTBfCOuha3zwmQSKCBWU0zXW dAnkFCMaUe63oe
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: ecrit@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:43:28 +0900
Message-ID: <003e01ca6289$85eb4370$4b725d85@nsnintra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AcpiiYL+qwhT8+0KQR+wNBB3ZCIKAw==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.75
Subject: [Ecrit] AI for Service URN Update
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:39:50 -0000

Hi all, 

Cullen forwarded feedback from the IESG back to the group and the main
concern with the document is that it currently only defines the change of
the policy but does not give any guidelines to the expert reviewer on what
would be acceptable entries. When considering the registry defined in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification-02 one
can easily imagine a huge number of items being registered and it is unclear
on what is acceptable and what not. 

Cullen further pointed out that the APPS area has tried to tackle this space
before and failed. 

Hence, the request was made to the group to find groups with an expertise
about this topic and whether something could be imported/re-used from there.


Ciao
Hannes