IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] Promised new version of "esnet" RPH

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Wed, 25 March 2009 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171E33A67D1; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w45b23V+UJKH; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318D93A693C; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,419,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="161477487"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2009 16:47:07 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n2PGl7vP008224; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:47:07 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2PGl7wk021939; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:47:07 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:47:07 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com ([10.89.22.191]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:47:06 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:47:04 -0500
To: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF37A29A4B.BB2BF959-ON85257584.0004556E-85257584.000474D6@ csc.com>
References: <XFE-SJC-2129ny7BXx40000c989@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com> <OF37A29A4B.BB2BF959-ON85257584.0004556E-85257584.000474D6@csc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-212vXLsdAef0000cba7@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2009 16:47:06.0905 (UTC) FILETIME=[552E7890:01C9AD69]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2260; t=1237999627; x=1238863627; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Ecrit]=20Promised=20new=20version=20of =20=22esnet=22=20RPH |Sender:=20; bh=NTmnvvDE+IBZhEr6zjuHkYG31SarCa7K7TU/VkneG84=; b=Yq6jfWrjCHrBapoz8t4hfro1r0y5YnBNw8xUdDd4qIEbekpzU3DyLc7Rcn fycyLRP80xtJ2XiVv2J6wv/E1P3/tK3lzGGdYned8sNIxTd4XLzcHQ6Qd7Bv LiojJ+t57g;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Cc: 'ECRIT' <ecrit@ietf.org>, ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Promised new version of "esnet" RPH
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:46:24 -0000

Chairs

Addressing the last of the open issues within 
draft-ietf-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-03, I formally request 
this document progress to WGLC, towards becoming a standards track RFC.

James

At 07:48 PM 3/24/2009, Janet P Gunn wrote:

>The changes in the 03 version address my concerns.  As far as I am 
>concerns it is now ready to go.
>
>Janet
>
>This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, 
>please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the 
>mistake in delivery.
>NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 
>CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit 
>written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the 
>use of e-mail for such purpose.
>
>
>"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
>Sent by: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
>
>03/24/2009 07:19 PM
>To
>"'ECRIT'" <ecrit@ietf.org>
>cc
>Subject
>[Ecrit] Promised new version of "esnet" RPH
>
>
>
>
>WG
>
>Here is the announcement of the new -03 version of the esnet
>resource-pirority header for this WG.  How's that for fulfilling a
>promise from within 24 hours, eh?
>
>I believe this version addresses each of Janet's concerns from
>yesterday's session.
>
>Please comment at will
>
>James
>
>                 Title           : IANA Registering a SIP Resource 
> Priority Header
>Namespace for
>                                 Local Emergency Communications
>                 Author(s)       : J. Polk
>                 Filename        : 
> draft-ietf-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-03.txt
>                 Pages           : 9
>                 Date            : 2009-03-24
>
>This document creates and IANA registers the new Session Initiation
>Protocol (SIP) Resource Priority header (RPH) namespace "esnet" for
>local emergency usage to a public safety answering point (PSAP),
>between PSAPs, and between a PSAP and first responders and their
>organizations.
>
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-03.txt
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email