IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com> Tue, 16 March 2021 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCC43A0E7E; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKwEDIQvgHbl; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D841E3A0E04; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.151.95] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:01:05 -0700
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy.all@ietf.org, ecrit@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:01:07 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <C443EB5E-89B3-4777-90AB-B063C1240A8A@coretechnologyconsulting.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZAusJnQrMeKrAkkij7A2WMnDYBTZ6mKr9gadWbyA4qHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <161591246412.5771.17798271339560020312@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwbAmYbX9A3f+okpum0Gz6hKhZz-_CPxhsu-nahFvVO7Bg@mail.gmail.com> <SN6PR13MB2334DCB45EB76B47C19AFDEE856B9@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAL0qLwZAusJnQrMeKrAkkij7A2WMnDYBTZ6mKr9gadWbyA4qHQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/X8nwRVjK7hi9h0LiyhN96yfp7PA>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:01:11 -0000

I just want to add that the document currently does contain some 
guidance.  Section 4 (IANA Considerations) contains:

The reviewer should verify that:
    o  the proposed new value is specified by the IETF, NENA, or a
       similar SDO in which location profiles are in scope;

--Randall

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email