Re: [Ecrit] draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc

[Randall Gellens <[e-mail]>]

Hi James,

So the draft currently specifies that only sos and children of sos 
are returned?  I'd missed that when I read and re-read the draft.  If 
so, that's fine with me, but maybe it can be made more clear.

For example, Section 4 says:

    The routing information in the location response consists of one or
    more service elements which is identified by a service name.  The
    service name is a URI and might contain a general emergency service
    urn such as urn:service:sos or might contain a specific service urn.

To me, this says that sos is just an example of a service that might 
be returned.

What might be better would be to modify my suggestion so that a 
<service> element can be included, and if not, the default is 'sos' 
and any children of 'sos'.


At 9:48 PM +1100 12/23/14, James Winterbottom wrote:

>  Hi Randy,
>
>  That could work, but that implies that you know what services that 
> the system supports.
>  I think that I would rather make an assumption that emergency and 
> the subset thereof are all we support and leave an extension point 
> for people to extend from if the need ever arises.
>
>
>  Cheers
>  James
>
>
>>  On 23 Dec 2014, at 8:36 pm, Randall Gellens <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>   > I have a technical question about the draft.  From my reading, 
> it appears that the extension is to add an empty 
> <requestRoutingInformation> element to a HELD request, and if the 
> server supports it, it includes a <routingInformation> element with 
> all possible values that could be returned.  Is this correct or am 
> I missing something?  If it is correct, why is the 
> <requestRoutingInformation> element empty rather than contain the 
> desired service?  Wouldn't it be simpler to include the specific 
> service of interest (e.g., 'sos'), as in the <service> element from 
> LoST and then the server only needs to look that up and return only 
> that?
>   >
>>
>>  At 4:19 PM +0000 12/22/14, Marc Linsner (mlinsner) wrote:
>>
>>>  All,
>>>
>>>  There is consensus to move forward with this work.
>>>
>>>  The chairs will request to the milestone addition for this draft 
>>> to be submitted to the IESG by September 2015, of course earlier 
>>> completion is always a good thing.
>>>
>>>  James, please submit a version as an IETF draft and we will approve.
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>>
>>>  Marc & Roger
>>>  ECRIT co-chairs
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Ecrit mailing list
>>>  [e-mail]
>>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  Randall Gellens
>>  Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
>>  -------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
>>  Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what value there may
>>  be in owning a piece thereof.                        --National Lampoon


-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others.
    --Groucho Marx