Re: [Ecrit] WG: Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-04.txt

Hi Christian,

I hope that the new draft version addresses your comments.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-05.txt

Ciao
Hannes

Christian Vogt wrote:
> Henning and Hannes, one brief comment:
>
>   
>>> Maybe this should be clarified either in this document, or in the
>>> Requirements document -- in particular because the Requirements document
>>> currently only talks about verifying the caller's location, rather than
>>> verifying whether there actually exists an emergency case at that
>>> location.
>>>       
>> The future emergency services infrastructure might be able to handle
>> more media types and accept additional data. However, it is quite likely
>> that the PSAP operator will not be able to use these things for a long
>> time since the capabilities are just not supported by end systems and in
>> some cases it might actually be difficult to expect the emergency caller
>> to take pictures (given the level of stress they are likely to
>> experience during an emergency situation).
>>     
>
> Right, and this is in line with what I was saying:  Verification of the
> truthfulness of (the extent of) a reported incident cannot be solved by the
> ECRIT protocol.  I was suggesting to clarify this in the requirements section.
>
> Best,
> - Christian
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit