Re: [Ecrit] [ecrit] review of: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-01

"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Sat, 24 January 2009 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ecrit-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67C43A684C; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:08:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BD528C153 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:08:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lBMhluDwNOdE for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:08:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B3EC3A6809 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:08:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2009 17:08:20 -0000
Received: from a91-154-108-144.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO 4FIL42860) [91.154.108.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 24 Jan 2009 18:08:20 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX187Wyw3syE7x6JhLXrMBXkE8RRokz9N30Tnn+gn4y UqKnA771Jdrrcd
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: 'Roger Marshall' <RMarshall@telecomsys.com>, "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>, hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu, ecrit@ietf.org
References: <8C837214C95C864C9F34F3635C2A65750BB7B568@SEA-EXCHVS-2.telecomsys.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:09:01 +0200
Message-ID: <010701c97e46$74f16f40$0201a8c0@nsnintra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <8C837214C95C864C9F34F3635C2A65750BB7B568@SEA-EXCHVS-2.telecomsys.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: Acl6ehFhaqBHlh01TYmHAA8v/thzrwDys+TQ
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.68
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] [ecrit] review of: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-01
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Roger, 
 
thanks for your review. I have addressed your comments and uploaded a new
version of the document, see 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-02.txt

One minor comment below: 

> C9. Section 6.1.,  LoST Synchronization Namespace Registration 
> The example of xml seems to lack some explanatory text to go with it,
e.g., 
> what is this registory for?, etc.  

This is necessary for the Relax NG schema. 

Ciao
Hannes



_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit