IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [edu-team] IANA Considerations

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 26 April 2012 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5FA21F87B7 for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4x1gjNITFmGH for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBFA21F8637 for <edu-team@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so587117wgb.13 for <edu-team@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JxOxbyQXc+b6pZB/t/QNQjY2xDGwxshjIMRluBFzr1E=; b=Bx0gANdTPleRRxp6+dMV7CzoR8oiJAOuoRD9YMqF4qN6n6qmmC+zMbyS0DhBhQCRn6 84zy0rpTgKVKcajuPHkANR9bXKnJOOG8BnLH5FzIwz7Cjq/RZjkEsnMw9vYbkzzpEgNA 4cCI3zlpVvq1N2IGDuzNVfpJAXXPlpjbw59vamK3baX6Myx9XPK6asfSsFsgJnAB8+pl O2eaXXwMJD2XH9wAj/hPqNR1Jej+u9t+7rTeB016tbAHnN5hSSG3xIXorzP8hzIXIfSb icD+gU84JoJ+axPJRraphxEEdnAuRdV9mjAJWWLsJopSMfnoHQpmIhu1Cz3gZ2OggdIF 1wpA==
Received: by 10.180.100.2 with SMTP id eu2mr6787947wib.1.1335424370491; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-219-204.as13285.net. [2.102.219.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff9sm42930879wib.2.2012.04.26.00.12.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F98F56E.9030003@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:12:46 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
References: <EAD1AA7D-FA29-4733-9179-9B42614411C7@vigilsec.com> <CAFOuuo62-i2ZxcNfpZo6ZN8PcyUfUTh1cspF-_NPAuOAC+LHDg@mail.gmail.com> <B5147FE1-984A-400E-A014-72562E17CCFD@amsl.com> <201204252055.q3PKtQHv029332@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <EDC39911-57C0-4516-9931-4F1C6FA8B2D3@lilacglade.org>
In-Reply-To: <EDC39911-57C0-4516-9931-4F1C6FA8B2D3@lilacglade.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, IETF EDU Team <edu-team@ietf.org>, Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [edu-team] IANA Considerations
X-BeenThere: edu-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Education Team <edu-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/edu-team>
List-Post: <mailto:edu-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:12:52 -0000

On 2012-04-25 22:35, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> 
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
>> Is Sunday afternoon the best place for IANA considerations? That may
>> be a fine topic for the WG lunch as well, because many chairs may not
>> realize they need the training...
> 
> Maybe both?
> 
> How to write a good IANA Considerations section is something every document author needs to know, so that points to a Sunday class.  

I agree. And while it might not take 2 hours, I can well imagine
it taking at least one hour including questions. Maybe a riff
on extensibility considerations (RFC 4775, draft-iab-extension-recs)
would round it out.

> However, the WG Chairs won't all go to the Sunday class, and do need to be able to assess if the IANA Considerations section is clear enough, as part of shepherding a document.  I think it might be a different or shorter class for WG chairs, since I'd expect they all already know something about IANA, but I think both groups could benefit.

Agreed
   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email