Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Last Call: <draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08.txt> (Additional Criteria for Nominating Committee Eligibility) to Experimental RFC

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sun, 06 December 2020 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E093A0E8F; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 07:29:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnAK7okzum6l; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 07:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCD83A0E89; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id v14so9397480wml.1; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WpGbRCWWo4xo8jcIWy9eFyV8l/dqdyiEZEd9KSYHOa8=; b=tDy+AMGn+lVsmQTblF2Pi3AL9yIgZxWjiv4uPdM808VkrIGJ78h4yGEHgKa2IMjHmb rFQHYyetxLBYZLQL/oY/HqP/dhEARAFXv9CNg9LBhOTR1SWbTpIRVa3X6TWopqVBKflD Slk12tOCRTd5Gc0JtTycKjZUsAz+uRXdD42VoDTfprFa24ZbBpYmkpxM55IbHjhJiXyt WeCKIMvipQ54Sz6DU7y2E8goRhMOmFz4A1QvPEJjMUYxEZ4AcCIBR3LJNh/CSBBVug7L Tt8z4YZuonjKXnbrrYU6ZOKawgiJTzkXk8XhtCgzN3cKkJu+ltuVQNbaQPFwSQjmPOgt TZ1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WpGbRCWWo4xo8jcIWy9eFyV8l/dqdyiEZEd9KSYHOa8=; b=UVhfdYEcUoMoKRJYQnveeLoEK7hs++q4Xm8p3gMTkkUV7NQFBW6O4VMyvVUl3WGlpi PQqmpB68N+JjMd0/mcbWBOOhdN8nx1nuCSii4+ppAqFbQCn6/ce4GVbO40XH6MCNcsms HnFgLd00FYOn9oauAHAR+G+zNiMSdJj4dBWoa8esubFieoLQyXz0gCexRut1bi/kN9DU ZaKfkWJFdbs2P8ODtQcrxGsUSTzwbA1wDcIBXuILgS35mBwbhs9+vhTs4RiSyEMFn/J2 +fwIqv6oDWZwnxBArP6ezqnP1mgjA5x4T9igb0QMwZsr0ModHLg4qx+LdvPdAFrFDLCQ J/rA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eRD+J/yhSA4eHxxJ+P6Om9CoIQ0y8/OFITeqEg2WhaVInlzUB QiEZw0WL7i49yMJzHOJyFi1Zc/xz0yulqyo3BwU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8MwiTzQlkXjgMoHG8acu/DxDqguY1a9wRHi87DQukanrL27uzNbPkpg0wqcXeE5ypZDXB9M0c7/Fzu3CBr50=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf09:: with SMTP id l9mr14116657wmg.54.1607268575540; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 07:29:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160692382495.7849.5070608602116062138@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADnDZ8-StG=FqWCVO_CEs_sjOuHxG6oX0BML50bQYg8G6JE_Cw@mail.gmail.com> <d5731c73-ebee-65fa-834e-8eab5d7dec39@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d5731c73-ebee-65fa-834e-8eab5d7dec39@gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:29:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ89fXgrk3X9k_gN450dP0PocZJep-dnR8M8=YKvYNU_QpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000080fa8d05b5cd60fd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/QoY0P5cdnkzLxLVsVVFSCbuPKdo>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Last Call: <draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08.txt> (Additional Criteria for Nominating Committee Eligibility) to Experimental RFC
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 15:29:40 -0000

On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 12:29 AM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> (Switching to the appropriate lists)
>
> On 06-Dec-20 11:14, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> >
> > draft>p3>goals>
> > - Ensure that those eligible are true "participants" with enough...)
> >
> > AB> I think it is not explained the meaning of "true participant", or I
> don't think that this is defined in IETF. IETF participants are known by
> their WGs, so each participant can be known through WG lists and drafts.
> >
> > AB>change: true "participant" <to> known "participant".
>
> The important part of the sentence is "with enough current understanding
> of IETF practices and people to make informed decisions." So this is more
> than "known" participants.
>
> I think it would better to simply write:
> Ensure that those eligible have enough current understanding of IETF
> practices and people to make informed decisions.
>
>
 thanks,

Regards
AB