[Eligibility-discuss] New draft: draft-rescorla-istar-recall-00

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3293112013B for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dSPpi4cGj8hd for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4300A120132 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id z5so3046697lji.10 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GcazPEI51QHBfxIgHx6JiRRJGYhFs097HTQMwHJPb+4=; b=M5Qd/a5NFFgKaezaHq1CAoGA8bwLn+sW6zlX0Iuy8Um3Ux1UXZCtGLZOqwjGoSl0Es YUem2NgvT2/IKTvCXR2Rp0RIf79WXrqoc4U6hUyAXv+fhTtkKrwEA9eLhcFx5mcAH2bQ WJp1qHp2SrulecfVxYd4MF8JiHfJFjQbEt+YGX1JiacbJ1dqXKfiH6865NVYHvmiBVAT WQA5pV0SxcYK+JIXWjEqo13AetQAagfTPrcLR73UvYQsNbZsVVOTVMHgQesbgkg0Z3OJ q1q9kPRoM7FFBmBsH6Q71ouu8q0cf74C5Y8k3kaOGlPGbSEYGOWeCdyhgDiqf4XHukKm VuHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GcazPEI51QHBfxIgHx6JiRRJGYhFs097HTQMwHJPb+4=; b=LG+FEc/NU5H/qSWxrrOqjXFeziBr50pnb3SCMyOoJwLxrCeXZMiRGZrzSDs31fb2R1 RD0fEJ3fWPDV5v8VS8yzEa3uc7bV9liejoNxqcEf03g299gJI1fjEmv49WmAxoaXjRi1 GaF2XVH1/nKLKkSI4fZuJkvt8BCqIrZJgTlzjTRjLo31/vBzzUEKuEv/zGtz47tgNdO5 iBLbK8K0Y/xVzydVFsaAwzMCUn21/WWcv9HBwvn9Roxil0M8uHRPHZFpRPSSvEs4mZvx lBxlUI4G7xkyrQZ/3348jf+35EIVsq/WqrYsVOKCN3TCbmkDApanndYHLTVKnFP6rItH egsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXiSrnLf5yAXhtx9/0WuThtNWmw/LVSrBnY0nG1G7314Av98vSx XASOp+7pJIU9YYew7AvD3jHo5xV5d3S8Lfd2gz4TmPe8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQrIdF2mEdUzQWybli3SwQbzR+miGnJDAHxbVZy4nwlZh5TsPt107IQqykNAd+7brR3TgvNw/n+H0sS8Dlbto=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:860a:: with SMTP id a10mr14354262lji.158.1558012617915; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 06:16:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNMorOsoyaga2Axh1285ps345GGNjtBYy7K84qhNS3FQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a58a200589011430"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/ZszOwykT9F5Lz52--AlVjObood4>
Subject: [Eligibility-discuss] New draft: draft-rescorla-istar-recall-00
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:17:02 -0000

Hi folks,

I've just posted a fleshed out version of the proposal that MSJ
made a while back of allowing a body to recall its members. Here's
the rationale:

This document proposes an alternate structure which is designed
to deal with just egregious cases (e.g., total member checkout,
major misconduct) but is also faster because it doesn't involve
spinning up the nomcom machinery (twice, once to recall and once
to replace). In this structure, the IAB/IESG would vote to
expel the offending member with consent from the other body.
The rationale here is that the body themselves is in the best
position to know when a member really needs to be removed.

Thanks for reading!

-Ekr