Re: [Eligibility-discuss] New draft: draft-rescorla-istar-recall-00

Hi Eric,

This goes a long way to address some of the well known problem cases, and I generally support what you wrote.  I struggle with the secrecy elements in your draft.  It’s not that I entirely disagree, but I think it would be good to articulate your reasoning.

Eliot

> On 16 May 2019, at 15:16, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> I've just posted a fleshed out version of the proposal that MSJ
> made a while back of allowing a body to recall its members. Here's
> the rationale:
> 
> This document proposes an alternate structure which is designed
> to deal with just egregious cases (e.g., total member checkout,
> major misconduct) but is also faster because it doesn't involve
> spinning up the nomcom machinery (twice, once to recall and once
> to replace). In this structure, the IAB/IESG would vote to
> expel the offending member with consent from the other body.
> The rationale here is that the body themselves is in the best
> position to know when a member really needs to be removed.
> 
> Thanks for reading!
> 
> -Ekr
> --
> Eligibility-discuss mailing list
> Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] New draft: draft-rescorla-istar-recall-00

Attachment: signature.asc