Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Seated Nomcom members

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eliot,
At 02:01 AM 02-05-2019, Eliot Lear wrote:
>s have to put that information aside for purposes of signing such a 
>petition.  I think you are also alluding to the possibility that 
>petition signatory names may be held in confidence.  However, they 
>oughtn't be held in confidence against members of the recall 
>committee.  That committee needs to be able to ask signatories why 
>they signed, and to otherwise provide justification for their 
>views.  I would worry less about current Nomcom members being 
>signatories and more about the limited pool of people able to 
>sign.  But I would worry less about BOTH if the number of required 
>signatories is reduced.

The is a comment about anonymous signatories at 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/g6D6xM463ulHFIOuRRBKTliYt1Y

A justification is required for a recall petition.  I assume that the 
signatories would have to agree to the justification for a petition 
before signing it.

The draft mentions that the fact that allowing members of a sitting 
nomcom to be a signatory is a poor idea.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy