IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Eligibility-discuss] Discussion at gendispatch?

"Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net> Wed, 06 November 2019 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE43412089D for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:22:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5x5HJWF04LXr for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:22:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E65812087E for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB65B934BF9E for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:22:15 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kB0OuJtuzVqz for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:22:15 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45394934BF95 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:22:15 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 07:22:14 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13r5655)
Message-ID: <A809A60C-D235-479D-8239-85332AC0569B@episteme.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/bQ3BVE0nFUYHaFe7myWzCOnqdIw>
Subject: [Eligibility-discuss] Discussion at gendispatch?
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:22:23 -0000

Greetings all,

Chatting with the ADs, we thought it might be useful to take a bit of 
agenda time at the gendispatch meeting to discuss whether the 
eligibility work is going to simply need AD sponsorship, or a new WG, or 
no action, or... Thoughts? The gendispatch meeting is Mon, 18 Nov at 
18:10 Singapore Time (10:10 UTC, 05:10 US Eastern Time, 14:10 Mauritius 
Time). Are the authors available (and sufficiently awake) at that time 
in order to participate?

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email