IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eman] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-06

"Emmanuel Tychon (etychon)" <etychon@cisco.com> Fri, 27 June 2014 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <etychon@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D2A1B31BD for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CThKmu6oc563 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D808B1B2FB8 for <eman@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4492; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403878013; x=1405087613; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references:to: in-reply-to; bh=aXCmizS2iT1COU+47iL0Xj2cbqcJ6EnOlGyZEe+r3Tw=; b=XV4QWxjgSJ5Ae67LiXiCvLly+AhIthz4cmriBpAbd3vhMuinT2TLDdrw Dba7YNEdis1aNZ8yrURFTczVDZQGxPKxxEDmwLMuLhoSY84Gs0hNJsfBL fjT3VTv/Vm6IjbyoaXbqb9bs+nY6NFw9841/0tgNwZd18rUjZaHYqzK92 Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 204
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al8FAC95rVOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABag1+rFgEBAQEBAQUBbZE9AYc/AYEedYQDAQEBAwEBAQEaURsLBEInMAYTiDoIDcNZEwSFZIg6EQECVYMtgRYBBJIPiEqLZYgQg0Q7gTo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,560,1400025600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="99429161"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2014 14:06:51 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-102-75.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-102-75.cisco.com [10.61.102.75]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5RE6nA2004819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <eman@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:06:50 GMT
From: "Emmanuel Tychon (etychon)" <etychon@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_34EDA7B3-607E-4C86-B361-61F677FF01BA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Message-Id: <15B30727-5F7D-4C2A-932F-3E8BEA69B607@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:06:49 +0200
References: <80CD82F6-032E-44FD-98D1-D8EBF82BFDD4@lucidvision.com>
To: eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <80CD82F6-032E-44FD-98D1-D8EBF82BFDD4@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/qRUpGdHuUZShPcHNPHX5oFE9-aU
Subject: Re: [eman] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-06
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:06:58 -0000

Hello -- 

I have reviewed draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-06 and I'm glad to see the state and maturity it has reached.

Only one comment below on my side:

2.14 "Power Capping".

"This gives vendors the option to use smaller, cost-effective power supplies that allow real world workloads to run at nominal themselves". 

This is not very clear and not totally true. The purpose of power-capping is to run a server without exceeding some power usage to remain under the critical available power threshold. If using power capping would lead to vendor using smaller power supplies, as this sentence suggests, then not using power capping would blow out the power supply... 

Thank you,
Emmanuel


On 25 Jun 2014, at 15:13, Thomas D. Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:

> 
> 	This email initiates a WG Last Call for draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-06. 
> The WG LC will end in two weeks from today on Wednesday, June 2, 2014 at 8AM EST.  Please
> post comments to the list before then.
> 
> 	Thank you,
> 
> 	Nevil and Tom
> 
> 
> 	
> _______________________________________________
> eman mailing list
> eman@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email