RE: [EME] the end of EME?

Paul Francis <francis@cs.cornell.edu> Wed, 30 January 2008 14:54 UTC

Return-path: <eme-bounces@irtf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKEKk-00062s-Q7; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:54:38 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKEKj-0005xN-GP for EME@irtf.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:54:37 -0500
Received: from mail-hub-2.cs.cornell.edu ([128.84.103.139] helo=exch-hub2.cs.cornell.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKEKi-00055f-5g for EME@irtf.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:54:37 -0500
Received: from EXCHANGE1.cs.cornell.edu (128.84.96.42) by mail-hub.cs.cornell.edu (128.84.96.245) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.0.751.0; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:54:32 -0500
Received: from EXCHANGE2.cs.cornell.edu ([128.84.96.44]) by EXCHANGE1.cs.cornell.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:54:32 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [EME] the end of EME?
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:54:24 -0500
Message-ID: <37BC8961A005144C8F5B8E4AD226DE1106EF2D@EXCHANGE2.cs.cornell.edu>
In-Reply-To: <C3C5F806.321CD%mshore@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [EME] the end of EME?
Thread-Index: AchjTu+wLivuaM9CEdyrYwAKleNSdAAALr1g
From: Paul Francis <francis@cs.cornell.edu>
To: "Melinda Shore" <mshore@cisco.com>, "Tilman Wolf" <wolf@ecs.umass.edu>, <EME@irtf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jan 2008 14:54:32.0101 (UTC) FILETIME=[05822D50:01C86350]
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc:
X-BeenThere: eme@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: end-middle-end research group <eme.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme>, <mailto:eme-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/eme>
List-Post: <mailto:eme@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eme-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme>, <mailto:eme-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: eme-bounces@irtf.org

I doubt that it much mattered whether or not we met with HIP.  In the end,
no-one stepped up to put real cycles into this work.  It was worth a try, but
in the end no sense in trying to push a dead cat with a rope to water.

PF


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melinda Shore [mailto:mshore@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:47 AM
> To: Tilman Wolf; EME@irtf.org
> Subject: Re: [EME] the end of EME?
> 
> On 1/30/08 9:26 AM, "Tilman Wolf" <wolf@ecs.umass.edu>; wrote:
> > After publishing
> > draft-irtf-eme-francis-nutss-design-00 last year and holding a good 
> > meeting at IETF-69 (jointly with HIPRG), activities have died down.
> 
> I'm not sure that things might not have gone differently if 
> we hadn't met with HIP, but there's no way to know for sure.
> 
> I think there's a broader question here, and that's the role 
> of signaling work in the IETF.  It's my general sense that 
> neither customers nor manufacturers like out-of-band 
> signaling very much, which suggests that in practice (for an 
> engineering
> organization) it's not going to be a very successful way to 
> solve problems.
> 
> Melinda
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EME mailing list
> EME@irtf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme
> 

_______________________________________________
EME mailing list
EME@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme