[Emu] [Errata Verified] RFC7170 (5127)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 01 April 2024 11:02 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570FCC14F68F; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcI_1DFo9d8E; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB24C14E515; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 2F5C05BDD43; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: vartiait@open.com.au, hzhou@cisco.com, ncamwing@cisco.com, jsalowey@cisco.com, steve.hanna@infineon.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: paul.wouters@aiven.io, iesg@ietf.org, emu@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240401110236.2F5C05BDD43@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 04:02:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/10tsi6IPgtN0wZZ1_9mMEEZ0QIU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 11:16:43 -0700
Subject: [Emu] [Errata Verified] RFC7170 (5127)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 11:02:40 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7170, "Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5127 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Tuure Vartiainen <vartiait@open.com.au> Date Reported: 2017-09-25 Verified by: Paul Wouters (IESG) Section: 5.2. Original Text ------------- IMSK = First 32 octets of TLS-PRF(EMSK, "TEAPbindkey@ietf.org" | "RFCORIGINAL_TEXT" | 64) Corrected Text -------------- IMSK = First 32 octets of TLS-PRF(EMSK, "TEAPbindkey@ietf.org" | "RFCCORRECTED_TEXT", 64) Notes ----- According to RFC5246 The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2 5. HMAC and the Pseudorandom Function "TLS's PRF is created by applying P_hash to the secret as: PRF(secret, label, seed) = P_<hash>(secret, label + seed)" -------------------------------------- RFC7170 (draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1 Publication Date : May 2014 Author(s) : H. Zhou, N. Cam-Winget, J. Salowey, S. Hanna Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : EAP Method Update Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Emu] [Errata Verified] RFC7170 (5127) RFC Errata System