Re: [Emu] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-11
Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org> Thu, 02 February 2023 16:08 UTC
Return-Path: <aland@freeradius.org>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A63C1575D6; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 08:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H_EpAg1-kiG9; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 08:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7364AC1575D8; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 08:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [75.98.136.130]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2934B2FF; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 16:08:44 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=freeradius.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org>
In-Reply-To: <167535092903.58884.17482056273488868556@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 11:08:43 -0500
Cc: int-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types.all@ietf.org, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <91C9DE73-A782-43BC-B6A0-EDD3B1498A3F@freeradius.org>
References: <167535092903.58884.17482056273488868556@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Bob Halley <rthalley@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/94umOfP01LxIIrNBYF5evQp-UpU>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-11
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 16:08:51 -0000
On Feb 2, 2023, at 10:15 AM, Bob Halley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > While I am not an EAP or TLS expert, I found the document to be very clearly > written, in particular in its explanations of why various choices were made. I > did not see anything worrisome in the document. Thanks. > The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text improvements) > with the document: > > 2.2: "when the j'th inner methods" seems like it would be better with "method". > 4: "and then perform resumption using another EAP type, just as EAP-TTLS (Type > 21)" should be "such as". Thanks. Fixed.
- [Emu] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-emu-tl… Bob Halley via Datatracker
- Re: [Emu] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-em… Alan DeKok