Re: [Emu] Idea: New X509 Extension for securing EAP-TLS

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 09 November 2019 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D3A120241 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 10:00:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAQ_q-8jxGqE for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 10:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF12120143 for <emu@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 10:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB89300B1C for <emu@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:00:05 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ZfyJheDH2vbb for <emu@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:00:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [5.5.33.237] (unknown [204.194.23.17]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACE1C300250; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:00:03 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <102dd850-b1ae-3426-8189-45876b7b419d@uni-bremen.de>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:00:03 -0500
Cc: emu@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <04E2AEF5-F1EE-4B74-B5BB-DFE099543C92@vigilsec.com>
References: <102dd850-b1ae-3426-8189-45876b7b419d@uni-bremen.de>
To: Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@uni-bremen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/9wUoM1f3lI7tuGXddbwxyQkJqnM>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Idea: New X509 Extension for securing EAP-TLS
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 18:00:08 -0000

With a very quick skim, it appears that you are trying to do the same thing as RFC 7585.

Russ


> On Nov 9, 2019, at 12:33 PM, Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@uni-bremen.de> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> Hi to all,
> 
> I have submitted a draft for a new X509v3 extension to improve security
> in EAP environments by including information which is implicitly defined
> by the communication context in the certificate .
> This is done e.g. by including the Realm of the username in the
> certificate, to give clients the opportunity to decide if the
> certificate can be trusted apart from (user-set) configuration.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rieckers-eapparameterextension/
> 
> This is a very early working state. I would be happy to get feedback if
> this is useful and the draft goes into the right direction.
> 
> If people are interested I would prepare a short presentation about
> deployment experiences in the eduroam at the University Bremen,
> which have lead to this draft, together with the basic idea how to solve
> these problems.
> 
> Probably this draft is not one which can or will be adopted by the EMU
> working group, but I think this is the right group of people for a first
> feedback.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Jan-Frederik Rieckers
> 
> 
>