IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] WGLC completed for for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-05

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Sun, 28 July 2019 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476A120071 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2019 15:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FyFJEE8ze5TH for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2019 15:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB22120041 for <emu@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2019 15:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.46.58] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC7D45A3; Sun, 28 Jul 2019 22:51:19 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <000d01d54588$ba8031d0$2f809570$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 18:51:17 -0400
Cc: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>, John Mattsson <john.mattsson@ericsson.com>, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D26A507B-430B-4D33-9778-0F34B9737EDD@deployingradius.com>
References: <CAOgPGoCB7VOzjo+ckDhNiApa6ozCDr3zfj6pMVG3ZRfV4RP6mQ@mail.gmail.com> <20190712210819.GA26853@w1.fi> <05B92C31-6CFB-4DFD-BCBD-EE5F3472D7B2@deployingradius.com> <20190713142127.GA32230@w1.fi> <DA0799BE-3F63-4214-9FF6-68CEF4D743C1@deployingradius.com> <56CF04D0-D093-43EF-A467-0163DA5F9160@ericsson.com> <C2583658-3506-4BE8-A6CA-8FFE5B798894@ericsson.com> <20190728195750.GA5671@w1.fi> <000d01d54588$ba8031d0$2f809570$@augustcellars.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/EQbhizstqYzy8_MsHtDG7Ofyp7M>
Subject: Re: [Emu] WGLC completed for for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-05
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 22:51:24 -0000

On Jul 28, 2019, at 5:09 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> 
> I cannot speak to PEAP, but it would seem that TEAP might need this feature
> as, at least on resumption, it is totally optional for both sides to use any
> TLVs an thus the same issue might be present.  TTLS seems to always require
> that the client send a AVP, but I am not sure that it is required for the
> server based on a really fast read.

  For initial authentication, TTLS requires TLVs inside of the TLS tunnel.  For resumption, the inner tunnel isn't used.

  So it looks like the other TLS-based EAP methods will have the same issue, when resumption is used.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email