[Emu] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc-10: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document (I liked the use of SVG graphics,
except for figure 7 though :-( ).

Nevertheless, section 3.1.4 contains `an anonymous NAI SHOULD be derived from
the NAI in the certificate` without any guidance required by
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/

Same issue in section 3.5 `However, EDHOC error messages SHOULD be considered
failure result indication,`

Section 4.1, s/indicates the length/indicates the length *in octets*/

Section 5: suggest adding the URL of the IANA registries as informative
references.