Re: [Emu] FW: Last Call: 'The Protected One-Time Password Protocol (EAP-POTP)' to Informational RFC (draft-nystrom-eap-potp)
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 05 June 2006 19:54 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnL9h-0003Gd-4K; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:54:29 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnL9W-00036z-1z for emu@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:54:18 -0400
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([193.234.218.130]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnL9T-0007Gg-IO for emu@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:54:17 -0400
Received: from p130.piuha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323FD89870; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:54:14 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE6D8985B; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:54:13 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <44848BE4.3000808@piuha.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:54:12 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060502)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [Emu] FW: Last Call: 'The Protected One-Time Password Protocol (EAP-POTP)' to Informational RFC (draft-nystrom-eap-potp)
References: <E1FnG8z-00019s-Ft@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <44846FB4.4010800@piuha.net> <448472BF.10508@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <448472BF.10508@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc: emu@ietf.org, eap@frascone.com
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/emu>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emu-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Hannes, > I must have missed it but who did the expert review for EAP-POTP? Technically, it does not need expert review for IANA allocation since an existing allocation (#32) is used. But I believe the document does need wider IETF review due to its potential impact in the real world, and that's why its being last called and I'm asking you to review it. In any case, I have reviewed this document and as a part of that review I also went through the same questions as we normally do on the expert review. That review was recently posted to the EAP WG list and resulted in a new revision of the document. In order to avoid e-mail duplication, if you have comments on my review or this thread, post your comment to the EAP list. But other comments on IETF last calls should normally go to the ietf@ietf.org list. --Jari _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
- [Emu] FW: Last Call: 'The Protected One-Time Pass… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Emu] FW: Last Call: 'The Protected One-Time … Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Emu] FW: Last Call: 'The Protected One-Time … Jari Arkko