Re: [Emu] Agenda Take 2

"SeongHan Shin" <seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp> Mon, 03 March 2008 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <emu-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-emu-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-emu-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A1E28C23C; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:29:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.096
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deXFbvP+6GHB; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB0B3A69F7; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:29:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: emu@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34773A69F7 for <emu@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:29:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IzVDcSt+DwDa for <emu@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:29:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp (mx1.aist.go.jp [150.29.246.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6683A67F7 for <emu@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m236TFYk014838; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:29:15 +0900 (JST) env-from (seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp)
Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m236TEkh017537; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:29:14 +0900 (JST) env-from (seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp)
Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m236T2Pt016489; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:29:05 +0900 (JST) env-from (seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp)
From: SeongHan Shin <seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp>
To: 'Dan Harkins' <dharkins@lounge.org>
References: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE50558F159@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com> <026b01c87cdd$02aabe20$08003a60$@shin@aist.go.jp> <1255.69.12.173.8.1204521406.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <1255.69.12.173.8.1204521406.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:27:28 +0900
Message-ID: <027501c87cf7$a71d22d0$f5576870$@shin>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ach87dOlknmflGA6RLmTqT9A34V+2AACSr4A
Content-Language: ja
Cc: 'Kazukuni Kobara' <k-kobara@aist.go.jp>, emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] Agenda Take 2
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/emu>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: emu-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: emu-bounces@ietf.org

Dear Dan Harkins,

Sorry, I didn't know that the ID is updated.
Anyway, I'll go through the new ID.

By the way, is "pwe" in section 2.6.4.2 the same as "PWE"?

Best regards,
Shin

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Harkins [mailto:dharkins@lounge.org] 
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 2:17 PM
To: SeongHan Shin
Cc: emu@ietf.org; 'Kazukuni Kobara'
Subject: Re: [Emu] Agenda Take 2


  Hi Shin,

  That draft has been updated. Please see the -01 version. That is
the one that will be presented in Philly and is, I believe, resistant
to off-line dictionary attack. If you know of an attack against it
I would be extremely interested in hearing about it.

  regards,

  Dan.

On Sun, March 2, 2008 7:16 pm, SeongHan Shin wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This is Shin.
> I read the below ID (Password only Mechanism)
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-00.txt
> to be presented at IETF 71.
>
> The idea of the protocol seems interesting.
> However, I found that the protocol is susceptible to off-line dictionary
> attack.
> If someone is interested, I'll show how the attack works.
> (you may already know that.)
>
> Best regards,
> Shin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: emu-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:emu-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Joseph
> Salowey (jsalowey)
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 8:04 AM
> To: emu@ietf.org
> Subject: [Emu] Agenda Take 2
>
> EMU Agenda
> IETF 71
> THURSDAY, March 13, 2008
> 0900-1130 Morning Session I
> ---------------------------------------------
> + Administrivia (5 min)
>  - agenda, blue sheets, note takers
>
> + Document Status (5 min)
>  - EAP-TLS  - draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-13.txt
>  - EAP-GPSK - draft-ietf-emu-eap-gpsk-08.txt
>
> + Charter Revision Status (70 min)
>  - General text (10 min)
>  - Tunnel Method (20 min)
>  - Secure Password Only Method (20 min)
>  - Channel Bindings (20 min)
>
> + Tunnel Method Requirements (30 min)
>  - draft-salowey-emu-eaptunnel-req-00.txt
>
> + Channel Bindings (20 min)
>  - draft-clancy-emu-chbind-00.txt
>  - draft-clancy-emu-aaapay-00.txt
>
> + Password only Mechanism (20 min)
>  - draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-00.txt
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>





_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu