IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] RFC 7170 (TEAP) errata

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 22 July 2019 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1745D12008C for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HCycu110IZux for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293E4120123 for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.46.58] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17FBF2002; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoBXrm0kGk4xsSen9ihCKRhVYgzPQR-H0C5AFtY9wChxqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:47:02 -0400
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jkmalinen@gmail.com>, emu@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F0527F34-CD94-405C-9863-F06AAD181060@deployingradius.com>
References: <CANe27jLO9eDA867X8hCHv_WRADN_txSp4xpRTxn2RpwS=yaquA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgPGoBXrm0kGk4xsSen9ihCKRhVYgzPQR-H0C5AFtY9wChxqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/U4eQGLFFi7bDz7NFrsBgBGENaUc>
Subject: Re: [Emu] RFC 7170 (TEAP) errata
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:47:09 -0000

On Jul 22, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
> [Joe] I'd like to hear if anyone has an implementation, and how they implemented on a cipher suite that is not SHA-1.

  TBH, I haven't seen an implementation.

  I suspect that the lack of implementations is why these questions are only coming up now.

>  My feeling is that it would be better to make the TLV length variable with the hash length.  However, I do not see why truncating would work as well. 

  My $0.02 is to allow a variable TLV length.

  I think it's OK to leave these as errata now.  I'm not sure that any existing EMU document would be appropriate for these changes.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email