[Emu] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7170 (6157)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 04 May 2020 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546AC3A0787 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gyxrKs2j47uF for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373373A0786 for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 851D1F406F5; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: hzhou@cisco.com, ncamwing@cisco.com, jsalowey@cisco.com, steve.hanna@infineon.com, rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, joe@salowey.net, mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: lear@cisco.com, emu@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200504102000.851D1F406F5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 03:20:00 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/VFzIplHU6CBNVnYGGwPHwdkcMCI>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 May 2020 11:57:08 -0700
Subject: [Emu] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7170 (6157)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 10:20:04 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7170,
"Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6157

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

Section: 4.2.9

Original Text
-------------
  Status

      The Status field is one octet.  This indicates the result if the
      server does not process the action requested by the peer.

Corrected Text
--------------
  Status

      The Status field is one octet.  This indicates the result if the
      party who receives this TLV does not process the action.

Notes
-----
The status field is carried in the "Request-Action" frame.  As is repeatedly stated in the chapeau of the section, the frame can be sent either by the server or the peer.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7170 (draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1
Publication Date    : May 2014
Author(s)           : H. Zhou, N. Cam-Winget, J. Salowey, S. Hanna
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : EAP Method Update
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG