Re: [Emu] Adoption call for EAP-EDHOC

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 05 December 2023 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0DAC151064 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 04:38:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUOQOGbQj2ST for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 04:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46750C14CE55 for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 04:38:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (135-23-95-173.cpe.pppoe.ca [135.23.95.173]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92870340; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 12:38:34 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <85C7362D-5FF0-4777-82ED-CC933115848E@akayla.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 07:38:33 -0500
Cc: "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6E39E71C-60D7-412B-80CF-77DD12E3A9B8@deployingradius.com>
References: <85C7362D-5FF0-4777-82ED-CC933115848E@akayla.com>
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/alSQY_Gbe8L_XMc7uKfCv6Ga78k>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Adoption call for EAP-EDHOC
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 12:38:42 -0000

  I support adoption.

  I'll review it for any general EAP issues.  I have less confidence in my ability to review any cryptography.

> On Nov 29, 2023, at 12:13 PM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
> 
> This is an adoption call for EAP-EDHOC (draft-ingles-eap-edhoc) [1].
> This draft was originally briefed in Yokohama and while it didn't 
> receive strong backing at that time, a short re-airing in Prague
> showed that there's distinct interest in taking on this work. While
> this work is not currently in scope for the EMU WG, it’s definitely
> something we could take on under a rechartering of the WG.
> 
> So, if you've got interest in seeing the work adopted, please
> formalize that by responding to the EMU mailing list with your
> position. We are particularly interested in hearing from parties
> who are willing to review and/or contribute to the development
> of the specification.
> 
> The deadline for feedback is November 13th. We hope to hear
> from lots of you.
> 
> Joe and Peter
> 
> 1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ingles-eap-edhoc/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu