IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] AD review draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-14

Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io> Mon, 26 February 2024 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5141C1654EF for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:25:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=aiven.io
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lv6xvgyHs0WX for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA228C151547 for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5649c25369aso4108988a12.2 for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:25:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aiven.io; s=google; t=1708964706; x=1709569506; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Lt+EPa+0mhzWs9+ivbKx3ySDTLmviuWfZ2W96hjb47c=; b=KPZK+eKqq8KMnBW7NL8cOqKpfEqwfVXJG54RBPnv++AHuBXS7S4GU9FzdLtSjpKnSv 1OsQK47zFrY59ZKyKGSP2UuduubwLg7eC8C5wjQfFqJFuyuuaBcaW065MidBao4NCw1/ NtaVPd/0YnXC+tPkTgyGwSzcLdrz0Cdkv4EoM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708964706; x=1709569506; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Lt+EPa+0mhzWs9+ivbKx3ySDTLmviuWfZ2W96hjb47c=; b=rl87+meEz1/0GT7w2IhIXQIYHQrz11V0N78pTM7fRBn2cQdYaj6X/eVph1WGZu+3MG 1scHWW9PqUg8WLGaDJl7DEFQ+LZ4wgX+JDvTNHe10b4CxdA8WDVi6mAwk3Eqceo11N+c aRM0lz5mLLKSmEVqiPMiXDaAbCP2Gl2iMlQlXAxEfl+OOoe8nzGMspp7twV9urJq7qyb WYSUXjjjVUS0/pQPO4FZinWHw1FbihR8FRrvqRRHQejAQ2h3T2M7sgCdpPosy0jSvjit pTgYoERsRsWseSmJDQb4ydqNZckwZSttbYD5wxt+aUi+woHfKWFsWPl7YzdTmedlrxeK 5Uzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyb+0+N4wwwRlZu58xoR78aGnDagK9pbItM8d+7NVi5+zDv4vwA QwMVWkBgfzezmgeNjBdBbeMOY16Uf+jksKRiPYVpBEznpmmEG4t/uIe5/5E3gd0PGYFD6LAFoiU /FiQ/J62N26NfVTPPpQFYPn/UKF1cH0OZmqlOzuvSroBSr4TK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGTJIx6ZgzSTa9pDofmqqjZCvQT/G3XwfijXXgPwIvGxZcslWuRCgr5ki4QRF3Bo0pXiyV33J8x3zuKG2eLBYg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:31bb:b0:566:28ae:55d4 with SMTP id dj27-20020a05640231bb00b0056628ae55d4mr240629edb.39.1708964706304; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:25:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGL5yWaU33DV1hkZdz0j78-tG6QpO0+TJJ6u00H5UyO2noxRmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD92956-34BE-4E9D-929E-65B9EB825AC4@freeradius.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD92956-34BE-4E9D-929E-65B9EB825AC4@freeradius.org>
From: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:24:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGL5yWbmvoufKET7n0uqwVh2ZojWGiYprK=ukmPR2M+Hge2gPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org>
Cc: emu@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000411b1406124b5ace"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/c0a87pVbxu_nqKmu6LGUDWvLq88>
Subject: Re: [Emu] AD review draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-14
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:25:12 -0000

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:49 AM Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org> wrote:

[cut text where we agreed[

> Appendix C.4 should clarify the TLS version used (1.2). Should it be
> > changed to use a TLS 1.3 example?
>
>   I think so, yes.  I'll have to dig into that.  I don't think I can get
> that updated today before the deadline.
>

You have another week :)

But no need to postpone starting the IETF LC for that, so I just started
that.

Thanks for the quick turnover!

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email