[Emu] New version of draft-rieckers-emu-eap-ute

Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de> Thu, 22 September 2022 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rieckers@dfn.de>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4238C14F73A for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dfn.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-QMUhn9-0Ev for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a1004.mx.srv.dfn.de (a1004.mx.srv.dfn.de [IPv6:2001:638:d:c301:acdc:1979:2:58]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FFAEC14F6E5 for <emu@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dfn.de; h= content-type:content-type:organization:subject:subject:from:from :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id :received; s=s1; t=1663865374; x=1665679775; bh=TNrpsB2SOARX4uHZ XeyGBUL9sZlylkWgjkkFX0oV7QE=; b=AyUtYwjsNhAsyfsr/D/y3Nxa7GsIKT7U HxDYbefxNd5ad2awLp8zVHQQnN4EARX/PhDKA3Irmd2rwCY6OjmX0SYYhDezYSai GLP4FZvjKqrQqYhjC4XEmRkvvNKVD76Kf77ixiirCv3UeTdr5iGHcjiTVCVYFz1J popq5+it7kk=
Received: from mail.dfn.de (mail.dfn.de [194.95.245.150]) by a1004.mx.srv.dfn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95F62000D5 for <emu@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:49:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:638:d:1016::1000] (unknown [IPv6:2001:638:d:1016::1000]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mspool2.srv.dfn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D33382 for <emu@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:49:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <7fa72069-a616-4d68-341e-260f247bf51b@dfn.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:49:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: emu@ietf.org
From: Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de>
Organization: DFN e.V.
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms010704010601010108090909"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/hgpnCgOo4sS6b4mlVdiHd9945t0>
Subject: [Emu] New version of draft-rieckers-emu-eap-ute
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 16:49:47 -0000

Hi,

I have just published a new version for my EAP-UTE draft I briefly 
presented at IETF 113 in Vienna.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rieckers-emu-eap-ute/


EAP-UTE is an EAP method like EAP-NOOB, which relies on an Out-Of-Band 
message to establish a mutual trust between peer and server.
Instead of JSON, EAP-UTE relies on CBOR for message encoding and aims to 
be extensible to allow for future use cases.


For the -00 version, I haven't received any direct feedback, whether 
this is something the emu-WG would be interested in.

Since my presentation I have changed the message format a bit and have a 
not yet complete but somehow functional proof-of-concept implementation 
with a custom server and an ESP32 with ESP-IDF as client.


I hope to get some feedback for this before IETF 115.

My main question is if the basic idea of re-defining EAP-NOOB with a 
different message flow and message encoding makes sense and would be a 
possible item for this working group or is this wasted effort?

The draft itself still has a lot of TODOs, but if someone is willing to 
read it and give feedback on the overall protocol design, I'd be 
grateful for that.

Greetings
Janfred

-- 
E-Mail: rieckers@dfn.de | Fon: +49 30884299-339 | Fax: +49 30884299-370
Pronomen: er/sein | Pronouns: he/him
__________________________________________________________________________________

DFN - Deutsches Forschungsnetz | German National Research and Education 
Network
Verein zur Förderung eines Deutschen Forschungsnetzes e.V.
Alexanderplatz 1 | 10178 Berlin
www.dfn.de

Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Odej Kao (Vorsitzender) | Dr. Rainer Bockholt | 
Christian Zens
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Christian Grimm | Jochem Pattloch
VR AG Charlottenburg 7729B | USt.-ID. DE 1366/23822