IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

Pascal Urien <pascal.urien@gmail.com> Wed, 14 March 2012 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <pascal.urien@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255FF21F8875 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdgZqyiX2+In for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D52321F8872 for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggmi1 with SMTP id i1so2648517ggm.31 for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=73MZrqkbm0N+YLbRQvoFo2Lr/+kdmBxSsqj7wXs4hIo=; b=CzGeEWJxsYSdPhqosZd65wGXt3hhgcVOkn4NkiH8FJOxemYtTFJE9aodGpz62TRNOE hKaPVn+sTkIo7ioeWD7WGyF1Lhe2/l+WZ9fsPG5TnrSeuQuPxvs9HY+d+Zh3f5gzpIyl AbJ+Y1nDmz1IwYuQxBgK1hDAyXxgkdqgSolpw/FMdbMjqKUsO0MWEM0P3wi+qDtdjZ9y qSKhS8Cv9lWQ1fyZiYLmqqDPJSQiJTbuWTa4IKP02IZfusoILboq5JiVTAxt7YiwWSg1 2y9OONohwqV0+fGH823NVZqVA/cFglzrqQQXNXLPytsAetWS1kPMHYOJTcECmABmx0j8 0wTw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.77.141 with SMTP id g13mr1488567qck.11.1331760358521; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.16.211 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tslsjhbmdli.fsf@mit.edu>
References: <4F561332.1070806@deployingradius.com> <CAEQGKXS7_ui5h8pYuwy7cc5KWyqnu+r9pzim1a4Tbzo-S-VVAA@mail.gmail.com> <tslhaxso00r.fsf@mit.edu> <CAEQGKXTx=n_DsA3-RUe9wyyfGXoUkCeEGe-EAReVuYquWiKw+A@mail.gmail.com> <tslsjhbmdli.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:25:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEQGKXThqKUius7WjObWLPWziX2gsxgkWb7haO7aut27Ege46w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pascal Urien <pascal.urien@gmail.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00235429cbe0187a7d04bb3a9f1b"
Cc: "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/emu>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:26:00 -0000

Hi Sam


EMU meansEAP Method Update.


The EMU WG is the child of the EAP WG


The eap smartcard draft was presented several times to the EAP WG.


But the support of efficient implementation and its compatibility with
smartphone OS, required more time than the EAP WG lifetime


Regards


Pascal


2012/3/14 Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>

> >>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Urien <pascal.urien@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>    Pascal> The goal of the presentation at the IETF 83 in Paris is to
>    Pascal> push this draft as an Informational RFC.
>
> Hi. I'm glad you want to publish this work as an RFC because I believe
> it's valuable and I'd like to see it an archival form.
> I'm supportive of efficiently publishing it as an RFC.
>
> I remaind confused because I don't understand how presenting the draft
> again to EMU will help that.  Are you hoping that emu will adopt the
> document and we'll publish an informational rfc through emu?  If so, I'm
> confused because I don't think that's in our charter.
>
> If you're hoping for an informational RFC not through EMU (either
> independent stream or IETF stream), how does the presentation help your
> goal?
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email