[Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5216 (2510)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 03 September 2010 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: emu@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC653A6998 for <emu@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.342
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.342 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.258, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NJdjhGKxNdTT for <emu@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04EF3A6953 for <emu@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A8E21E06AE; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: dansimon@microsoft.com, bernarda@microsoft.com, rmh@microsoft.com, turners@ieca.com, tim.polk@nist.gov, aland@deployingradius.com, jsalowey@cisco.com, aland@freeradius.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100903205155.A8E21E06AE@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:51:55 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:18:11 -0700
Cc: min.pae@viasat.com, emu@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5216 (2510)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/emu>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:51:27 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5216,
"The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5216&eid=2510

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Min Pae <min.pae@viasat.com>

Section: 3.1

Original Text
-------------
The L bit (length included) is set to indicate the presence of the
four-octet TLS Message Length field, and MUST be set for the first
fragment of a fragmented TLS message or set of messages.

Corrected Text
--------------
The L bit (length included) is set to indicate the presence of the
four-octet TLS Message Length field, and MUST be set for the first
fragment of a fragmented TLS message.  The L bit MAY be included
in all fragments of a fragmented TLS message, but if included the
TLS Length MUST represent the entire length of the TLS message.

Notes
-----
The lack of definition for what to do with the L bit and the TLS length field for TLS fragments other than the first fragment is leaving the door open to divergent behavior for whether the L bit and length field are included, what the length contains if they're included, and how to interpret it.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5216 (draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol
Publication Date    : March 2008
Author(s)           : D. Simon, B. Aboba, R. Hurst
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : EAP Method Update
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG