Re: [Emu] [EXTERNAL] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5216 (6357)

Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> Wed, 16 December 2020 16:38 UTC

From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
To: "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
CC: "dansimon@microsoft.com" <dansimon@microsoft.com>, "rmh@microsoft.com" <rmh@microsoft.com>, "rdd@cert.org" <rdd@cert.org>, "kaduk@mit.edu" <kaduk@mit.edu>, "joe@salowey.net" <joe@salowey.net>, "mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com" <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5216 (6357)
Thread-Index: AQHW02/o7w/py+MkmkOmA5EFq+/dVan57NWk
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 16:38:16 +0000
Message-ID: <229AAB27-64CD-4A9F-BEB2-56BB0467ADC7@microsoft.com>
References: <20201216055329.2B6D2F40749@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20201216055329.2B6D2F40749@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9c847531-ea25-4c55-93ea-08d8a1e0fd24
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Dec 2020 16:38:16.4394 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: yOaKlHUKzK4UXU6XxP2gRYHNQPgnTQc2HYZvGKsq8LZoUlovgmuN5Y1+k/Om5DsTg9r3AM/ikF+bdfHFjsN8DQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR00MB0896
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/v1ATjBypnROk-hNNr33w2XG-evU>
Subject: Re: [Emu] [EXTERNAL] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5216 (6357)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 16:38:23 -0000

Looks ok to me.

> On Dec 15, 2020, at 21:54, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5216,
> "The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid6357&amp;data=04%7C01%7CBernard.Aboba%40microsoft.com%7Cfd18c37634264d91633508d8a186ee08%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C0%7C0%7C637436948647284983%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&amp;sdata=JmTH%2BEcw1ksnycAeZyqgtUyJcpv3%2FtMF0zQp1gCMqQo%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
> 
> Section: 5.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   [3] Section 5 of BCP 86 [RFC3766] offers advice on the required RSA
>   or Diffie-Hellman (DH) module and Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA)
>   subgroup size in bits, for a given level of attack resistance in
>   bits.  For example, a 2048-bit RSA key is recommended to provide
>   128-bit equivalent key strength.  The National Institute of Standards
>   and Technology (NIST) also offers advice on appropriate key sizes in
>   [SP800-57].
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   [3] Section 5 of BCP 86 [RFC3766] offers advice on the required RSA
>   or Diffie-Hellman (DH) modulus and Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA)
>   subgroup size in bits, for a given level of attack resistance in
>   bits.  For example, a 2048-bit RSA key is recommended to provide
>   128-bit equivalent key strength.  The National Institute of Standards
>   and Technology (NIST) also offers advice on appropriate key sizes in
>   [SP800-57].
> 
> Notes
> -----
> RSA and DH computations are parameterized by their moduli, with singular "modulus" (not "module").
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5216 (draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-13)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol
> Publication Date    : March 2008
> Author(s)           : D. Simon, B. Aboba, R. Hurst
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : EAP Method Update
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

[Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5216 (6357) RFC Errata System
Re: [Emu] [EXTERNAL] [Editorial Errata Reported] … Bernard Aboba