[Endymail] Could we converge on one message format?

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 23 September 2014 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799CA1A1B34 for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXkhNaJL1tGR for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2A21A1B23 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z107so4715755qgd.6 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MVVoE1IrKtKfmc59Eb7/8wSiyXXBjgYM5it6kJtRHKw=; b=gvFH84aTWLLf4W366oOH5DPcmkThU48FBnnEE7PlM/3z+79o+cRgWQMHMIPrG5kK2g hJ+huxbeVvDN+NfJS7TFZ1K7MTJp8e8Ipow9r1wOvQ5Jw4e1/fm/W8Jj9JbZgPBQb7JX aftVoV77GUJ/xHUogiVCFUd9DNWszwspT/FRDvCBSDFan2551frViUPGQFaQQ+4Gq0kC Gppjfq9exZz2T8imGIgFqgPtViPQ/OXNtHiZuoQTq6DuVPljMq7t7iq5QQPQcG0Gz51o lSa9MwMSuXqHxf06XpMR/IVcSrrfngKJkbkGizWYohgZzjz3PcdqKf7clUM6zyMbsKeD YqvQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.10.198 with SMTP id q6mr1001118qaq.55.1411490486782; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.95.232 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:41:26 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9jghyYTin0VCO0GZKfMkaWeci28
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwg4A=-Sbw3TWuqrnN8C4g11_bKmgWhKJZUOdDxAXFPecw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: endymail <endymail@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/GlfHEeqqhclm5JhBugtPL91dImc
Subject: [Endymail] Could we converge on one message format?
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:41:29 -0000

At the moment we have S/MIME, PGP and PGP/MIME bindings.

None is completely satisfactory as implemented in the running code.
All the formats pass the subject header in the clear for a start. PGP
is highly unsatisfactory as it does not support attachments and
PGP/MIME addresses that problem in theory but does not have all the
testing S/MIME has.

Is it possible we could converge on one message format that would be
adopted as the common spec for future implementations?

The reason I am raising this is that right now some folk are working
on WebMail that is end to end. And surprising as it might seem, it is
quite practical to have end-to-end WebMail. We do have to extend the
Web specs however.

If we make a decision now, it could potentially be a point of
convergence. The email world has adopted HTML from the Web, they will
pull in a message format. BUT only if they can do that in a
straightforward way and whatever message format is chosen supports
PKIX keying and attachments.


Right/wrong track?