Re: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMapping deprecation
Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com> Tue, 17 August 2004 21:46 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA16637
for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:46:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
id 1BxBeE-0000sz-Nt; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:37:38 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BxBYp-0007p0-Hf
for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:32:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA15556
for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:32:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from thumper.research.telcordia.com ([128.96.41.1])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxBem-0004iF-41
for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:38:21 -0400
Received: from shannon.research.telcordia.com
(shannon-83.research.telcordia.com [128.96.83.11])
by thumper.research.telcordia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
i7HLVI5C012356
for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kaj-100.research.telcordia.com (kaj-100.cc.telcordia.com
[128.96.171.145])
by shannon.research.telcordia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA25264
for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040817172040.026f8378@128.96.81.11>
X-Sender: kaj@128.96.81.11
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:31:24 -0400
To: entmib@ietf.org
From: Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com>
Subject: Re: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMapping deprecation
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040816094625.022f49c0@127.0.0.1>
References: <20040816082053.GD1761@iu-bremen.de>
<p0602041fbd39fdb5fff2@[130.129.130.34]>
<p0602041fbd39fdb5fff2@[130.129.130.34]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====================_-1772244533==_"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0a0a359c89658364740632bd00d43825
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>,
<mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>,
<mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
i've attached an update of the entity supplemental miblet. the updates concern: - change of the title - inclusion of Juergen's suggested URN text & object - reference to a to be published rfc for CLEI URN namespace further actions: - as per the emerging consensus, it is better to insert the two objects in the entPhysicalEntry of the entity mib itself; in that case all that is needed is to cut&paste from the attached - we'll post the draft for the for CLEI URN namespace request soon - any other comments? kaj At 09:53 AM 8/16/2004 -0700, David T. Perkins wrote: >HI, > >The below sounds like a good suggestion to me. > >At 10:20 AM 8/16/2004 +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:41:02PM -0400, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > > >> During the Entity MIB meeting at IETF 60 in San Diego, there was > >> consensus in the room for the following course of action: > >> > >> (1) Pull the Entity State MIB document out of IESG processing > >> (currently submitted for publication as a Draft Standard) > >> > >> (2) Update the document to undo the deprecation of the > >> entAliasMapping identifier, and > >> > >> (3) Re-submit the Entity MIB to the IESG for publication as a > >> Proposed Standard. > >> > >> We now need to confirm this consensus on the mailing list. Are there > >> any objections to taking this course of action? Other comments? > > > >Sounds like a good plan to me. But if we recycle at Proposed, why do > >we then not simply put the entSupplPhysicalManufacturingDate and the > >entSupplPhysicalManufacturerInfo objects into the entPhysicalEntry > >where they actually belong? A new compliance statement would deal > >with these additions so existing implementations that comply to > >entity2Compliance would not be affected. > > > >/js >Regards, >/david t. perkins > > >_______________________________________________ >Entmib mailing list >Entmib@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ REACH INFO HAS CHANGED; NEW INFO PER 7/19/04: _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Kaj Tesink Telcordia Technologies. Inc. 1 Telcordia Drive Piscataway, NJ 08854-3923 Email: kaj@research.telcordia.com Tel: (732) 699-6068 Fax: (732) 336-2336 _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMapping de… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMappin… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMappin… Kaj Tesink
- Re: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMappin… David T. Perkins
- Re: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMappin… C. M. Heard
- Re: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMappin… Kaj Tesink
- Re: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMappin… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- RE: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAliasMappin… David B Harrington
- Adding RE: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo entAlia… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Adding RE: [Entmib] CONSENSUS CHECK: Undo ent… Andy Bierman